10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on October 28, 2009
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-14428
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda | 98-014-1974 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Renaissance House, 8-20 East Broadway, Pembroke HM 19 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)
(441) 295-4513
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x, Accelerated filer ¨, Non-accelerated filer ¨, Smaller reporting company ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of outstanding shares of RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.s common shares, par value US $1.00 per share, as of October 22, 2009 was 62,400,299.
Total number of pages in this report: 80
Table of Contents
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands of United States Dollars)
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||
Assets |
||||||
Fixed maturity investments available for sale, at fair value |
||||||
(Amortized cost $4,413,428 and $2,916,991 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
$ | 4,505,446 | $ | 2,996,885 | ||
Short term investments, at fair value |
880,406 | 2,172,343 | ||||
Other investments, at fair value |
812,056 | 773,475 | ||||
Investments in other ventures, under equity method |
94,859 | 99,879 | ||||
Total investments |
6,292,767 | 6,042,582 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
347,993 | 274,692 | ||||
Premiums receivable |
826,562 | 565,630 | ||||
Ceded reinsurance balances |
207,257 | 88,019 | ||||
Losses recoverable |
253,312 | 299,534 | ||||
Accrued investment income |
34,076 | 26,614 | ||||
Deferred acquisition costs |
95,614 | 81,904 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold |
188,497 | 236,485 | ||||
Other secured assets |
27,464 | 76,424 | ||||
Other assets |
201,982 | 217,986 | ||||
Goodwill and other intangibles |
69,175 | 74,181 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,544,699 | $ | 7,984,051 | ||
Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest and Shareholders Equity |
||||||
Liabilities |
||||||
Reserve for claims and claim expenses |
$ | 1,837,879 | $ | 2,160,612 | ||
Reserve for unearned premiums |
805,199 | 510,235 | ||||
Debt |
450,000 | 450,000 | ||||
Reinsurance balances payable |
457,947 | 315,401 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased |
247,502 | 378,111 | ||||
Other secured liabilities |
27,500 | 77,420 | ||||
Other liabilities |
251,504 | 290,998 | ||||
Total liabilities |
4,077,531 | 4,182,777 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
746,698 | 768,531 | ||||
Shareholders Equity |
||||||
Preference shares |
650,000 | 650,000 | ||||
Common shares |
62,390 | 61,503 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
25,494 | | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
78,338 | 75,387 | ||||
Retained earnings |
2,904,248 | 2,245,853 | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,720,470 | 3,032,743 | ||||
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest and shareholders equity |
$ | 8,544,699 | $ | 7,984,051 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands of United States Dollars, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 202,413 | $ | 239,806 | $ | 1,655,886 | $ | 1,574,419 | ||||||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 75,098 | $ | 194,408 | $ | 1,153,304 | $ | 1,211,546 | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in unearned premiums |
220,915 | 184,934 | (175,726 | ) | (146,717 | ) | ||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
296,013 | 379,342 | 977,578 | 1,064,829 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
106,815 | 15,767 | 263,234 | 106,955 | ||||||||||||
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) |
1,556 | 3,448 | (12,761 | ) | 8,153 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures |
4,331 | 2,333 | 11,499 | 13,455 | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
13,424 | 2,258 | (5,027 | ) | 10,246 | |||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
16,794 | 11,198 | 57,809 | 28,322 | ||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairments |
(1,408 | ) | (98,808 | ) | (25,719 | ) | (150,763 | ) | ||||||||
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income, before taxes |
1,062 | | 4,518 | | ||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(346 | ) | (98,808 | ) | (21,201 | ) | (150,763 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenues |
438,587 | 315,538 | 1,271,131 | 1,081,197 | ||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
38,567 | 535,347 | 191,587 | 731,720 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
44,203 | 54,231 | 141,302 | 154,272 | ||||||||||||
Operational expenses |
45,498 | 30,296 | 132,120 | 93,903 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
(4,319 | ) | 3,116 | 8,608 | 18,930 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
3,748 | 5,379 | 12,084 | 18,120 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
127,697 | 628,369 | 485,701 | 1,016,945 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
310,890 | (312,831 | ) | 785,430 | 64,252 | |||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
(3,993 | ) | 455 | (3,793 | ) | (936 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
306,897 | (312,376 | ) | 781,637 | 63,316 | |||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(37,694 | ) | 91,977 | (122,821 | ) | 10,321 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to RenaissanceRe |
269,203 | (220,399 | ) | 658,816 | 73,637 | |||||||||||
Dividends on preference shares |
(10,575 | ) | (10,575 | ) | (31,725 | ) | (31,725 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 258,628 | $ | (230,974 | ) | $ | 627,091 | $ | 41,912 | |||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per common share - basic |
$ | 4.15 | $ | (3.79 | ) | $ | 10.09 | $ | 0.66 | |||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per common share - diluted (1) |
$ | 4.12 | $ | (3.79 | ) | $ | 10.03 | $ | 0.65 | |||||||
Dividends per common share |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.69 |
(1) | Earnings per share calculations use average common shares outstanding - basic, when in a net loss position, as required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands of United States Dollars)
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
Preference shares |
||||||||
Balance - January 1 |
$ | 650,000 | $ | 650,000 | ||||
Repurchase of shares |
| | ||||||
Balance - September 30 |
650,000 | 650,000 | ||||||
Common shares |
||||||||
Balance - January 1 |
61,503 | 68,920 | ||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| (8,064 | ) | |||||
Exercise of options and issuance of restricted stock and awards |
887 | 545 | ||||||
Balance - September 30 |
62,390 | 61,401 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
||||||||
Balance - January 1 |
| 107,867 | ||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| (129,428 | ) | |||||
Reduction in redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
1,870 | | ||||||
Exercise of options and issuance of restricted stock and awards |
23,624 | 21,561 | ||||||
Balance - September 30 |
25,494 | | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
||||||||
Balance - January 1 |
75,387 | 44,719 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes (1) |
(76,198 | ) | | |||||
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
83,667 | (28,175 | ) | |||||
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income |
(4,518 | ) | | |||||
Balance - September 30 |
78,338 | 16,544 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
||||||||
Balance - January 1 |
2,245,853 | 2,605,997 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes (1) |
76,198 | | ||||||
Net income |
781,637 | 63,316 | ||||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(122,821 | ) | 10,321 | |||||
Repurchase of shares |
| (290,914 | ) | |||||
Dividends on common shares |
(44,894 | ) | (43,699 | ) | ||||
Dividends on preference shares |
(31,725 | ) | (31,725 | ) | ||||
Balance - September 30 |
2,904,248 | 2,313,296 | ||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
$ | 3,720,470 | $ | 3,041,241 | ||||
(1) | Cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of April 1, 2009, related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, as required by the Investments - Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB ASC. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands of United States Dollars)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 306,897 | $ | (312,376 | ) | $ | 781,637 | $ | 63,316 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period |
75,777 | (22,005 | ) | 91,699 | (33,567 | ) | ||||||||||
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(1,062 | ) | | (4,518 | ) | | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
381,612 | (334,381 | ) | 868,818 | 29,749 | |||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(37,694 | ) | 91,977 | (122,821 | ) | 10,321 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(8,442 | ) | 2,987 | (8,032 | ) | 5,392 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(46,136 | ) | 94,964 | (130,853 | ) | 15,713 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to RenaissanceRe |
$ | 335,476 | $ | (239,417 | ) | $ | 737,965 | $ | 45,462 | |||||||
Disclosure regarding net unrealized gains (losses) |
||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period |
$ | 83,783 | $ | (106,628 | ) | $ | 120,275 | $ | (150,616 | ) | ||||||
Net realized (gains) losses and net other-than-temporary impairments included in net income |
(16,448 | ) | 87,610 | (36,608 | ) | 122,441 | ||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
$ | 67,335 | $ | (19,018 | ) | $ | 83,667 | $ | (28,175 | ) | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 781,637 | $ | 63,316 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Amortization and depreciation |
1,749 | (1,408 | ) | |||||
Net realized (gains) losses on investments |
(57,809 | ) | (28,322 | ) | ||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
21,201 | 150,763 | ||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of other ventures |
356 | 6,900 | ||||||
Net unrealized (gains) losses included in net investment income |
(71,478 | ) | 104,031 | |||||
Net unrealized losses included in other (loss) income |
(8,745 | ) | 934 | |||||
Change in: |
||||||||
Premiums receivable |
(260,932 | ) | (252,971 | ) | ||||
Ceded reinsurance balances |
(119,238 | ) | (47,571 | ) | ||||
Deferred acquisition costs |
(13,710 | ) | (9,826 | ) | ||||
Reserve for claims and claim expenses, net |
(276,511 | ) | 288,123 | |||||
Reserve for unearned premiums |
294,964 | 194,288 | ||||||
Reinsurance balances payable |
142,546 | 85,399 | ||||||
Other |
17,968 | 810 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
451,998 | 554,466 | ||||||
Cash flows provided by investing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments available for sale |
7,233,832 | 7,924,853 | ||||||
Purchases of investments available for sale |
(8,687,053 | ) | (7,903,037 | ) | ||||
Net sales of short term investments |
1,291,937 | 383,348 | ||||||
Net sales (purchases) of other investments |
32,897 | (192,485 | ) | |||||
Net purchases of investments in other ventures |
| (31,332 | ) | |||||
Net sales of other assets |
69 | | ||||||
Net purchase of subsidiaries |
| (76,631 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(128,318 | ) | 104,716 | |||||
Cash flows used in financing activities |
||||||||
Dividends paid - RenaissanceRe common shares |
(44,894 | ) | (43,699 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid - preference shares |
(31,725 | ) | (31,725 | ) | ||||
RenaissanceRe common share repurchase |
| (428,406 | ) | |||||
DaVinciRe share repurchase |
| (100,000 | ) | |||||
Third party DaVinciRe share transactions |
(123,718 | ) | 43,549 | |||||
Redemption of 7.0% Senior Notes |
| (150,000 | ) | |||||
Reverse repurchase agreement |
(50,042 | ) | | |||||
Net (repayment) drawdown of debt |
| 148,049 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(250,379 | ) | (562,232 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
73,301 | 96,950 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
274,692 | 330,226 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 347,993 | $ | 427,176 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars) (Unaudited)
1. | Organization and Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information and in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position and results of operations as at the end of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated from these statements. The preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The major estimates reflected in the Companys consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the reserve for claims and claim expenses; losses recoverable, including allowances for losses recoverable deemed uncollectible; estimates of written and earned premiums; the fair value of investments and financial instruments, including derivative instruments; premiums and other accounts receivable, including allowances for amounts deemed uncollectible; and estimates relating to the Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries include the following principal entities:
| RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RenaissanceRe or the Company), was formed under the laws of Bermuda on June 7, 1993. Through its subsidiaries, the Company provides reinsurance and insurance to a broad range of customers. |
| Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd. (Renaissance Reinsurance), the Companys principal reinsurance subsidiary, provides property catastrophe and specialty reinsurance coverages to insurers and reinsurers on a worldwide basis. |
| The Company also manages property catastrophe and specialty reinsurance business written on behalf of joint ventures, which principally include Top Layer Reinsurance Ltd. (Top Layer Re), recorded under the equity method of accounting, and DaVinci Reinsurance Ltd. (DaVinci). Because the Company owns a noncontrolling equity interest in, but controls a majority of the outstanding voting power of, DaVincis parent, DaVinciRe Holdings Ltd. (DaVinciRe), the results of DaVinci and DaVinciRe are consolidated in the Companys financial statements. Noncontrolling interest represents the interests of external parties with respect to the net income (loss) and shareholders equity of DaVinciRe. Renaissance Underwriting Managers Ltd. (RUM), a wholly owned subsidiary, acts as exclusive underwriting manager for these joint ventures in return for fee-based income and profit participation. |
| The Companys Individual Risk operations include direct insurance and quota share reinsurance written through the operating subsidiaries of RenRe Insurance Holdings Ltd. (RenRe Insurance), formerly known as Glencoe Group Holdings Ltd. These operating subsidiaries principally include Stonington Insurance Company (Stonington), which writes business in the United States on an admitted basis, and Glencoe Insurance Ltd. (Glencoe) and Lantana Insurance Ltd. (Lantana), which write business in the United States on an excess and surplus lines basis, and also provide reinsurance coverage, principally through quota share contracts, which are analyzed on an individual risk basis. The Individual Risk operations also include the results of Agro National Inc. (Agro National), a managing general underwriter of multi-peril crop insurance. |
8
Table of Contents
| RenaissanceRe Syndicate 1458 (Syndicate 1458), the Companys Lloyds syndicate, which was licensed to start writing certain lines of insurance and reinsurance business effective June 1, 2009. RenaissanceRe Corporate Capital (UK) Limited (RenaissanceRe CCL), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is Syndicate 1458s sole corporate member. |
Certain comparative information has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Because of the seasonality of the Companys business, the results of operations and cash flows for any interim period will not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations and cash flows for the full fiscal year or subsequent quarters.
2. | Ceded Reinsurance |
The Company purchases reinsurance and other protection to manage its risk portfolio and to reduce its exposure to large losses. The Company currently has in place contracts that provide for recovery of a portion of certain claims and claim expenses from reinsurers generally in excess of various retentions or on a proportional basis. The Company remains liable to the extent that any third-party reinsurer or other obligor fails to meet its obligations. The earned reinsurance premiums ceded were $170.2 million and $96.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $383.3 million and $315.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition to loss recoveries, certain of the Companys ceded reinsurance contracts provide for recoveries of additional premiums, reinstatement premiums and for lost no-claims bonuses, which are incurred when losses are ceded to other reinsurance contracts. Total reinsurance recoveries netted against claims and claim expenses incurred were $20.1 million and $112.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $85.2 million and $151.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
3. | Earnings per Share |
Basic earnings per common share is based on weighted average common shares and excludes any dilutive effects of stock options and restricted stock. Diluted earnings per common share assumes the exercise of all dilutive stock options and restricted stock grants.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to determine whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic Earnings per Share. Effective January 1, 2009, the two-class method is used to determine earnings per share based on dividends declared on common stock and participating securities (i.e. distributed earnings) and participation rights of participating securities in any undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted stock granted by the Company to its employees is now considered a participating security. The Company now uses the two-class method to calculate its net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per common share basic and diluted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys prior calculations of net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per common share basic and diluted, and therefore prior periods have not been restated.
9
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data) | ||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 258,628 | $ | (230,974 | ) | |||
Amount allocated to participating common shareholders (1) |
(6,067 | ) | 2,901 | |||||
$ | 252,561 | $ | (228,073 | ) | ||||
Denominator (in thousands): |
||||||||
Denominator for basic income per RenaissanceRe common share - |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares |
60,898 | 60,943 | ||||||
Per common share equivalents of employee stock options and restricted shares |
469 | 751 | ||||||
Denominator for diluted income per RenaissanceRe common share - |
||||||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares and assumed conversions |
61,367 | 61,694 | ||||||
Basic income (loss) per RenaissanceRe common share |
$ | 4.15 | $ | (3.79 | ) | |||
Diluted income (loss) per RenaissanceRe common share (2) |
$ | 4.12 | $ | (3.79 | ) |
(1) | Represents earnings attributable to holders of unvested restricted shares issued under the Companys 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan. |
(2) | Earnings per share calculations use average common shares outstanding - basic, when in a net loss position, as required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. |
Nine months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data) | ||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 627,091 | $ | 41,912 | ||||
Amount allocated to participating common shareholders (1) |
(13,310 | ) | (607 | ) | ||||
$ | 613,781 | $ | 41,305 | |||||
Denominator (in thousands): |
||||||||
Denominator for basic income per RenaissanceRe common share - |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares |
60,832 | 63,131 | ||||||
Per common share equivalents of employee stock options and restricted shares |
394 | 994 | ||||||
Denominator for diluted income per RenaissanceRe common share - |
||||||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares and assumed conversions |
61,226 | 64,125 | ||||||
Basic income per RenaissanceRe common share |
$ | 10.09 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Diluted income per RenaissanceRe common share |
$ | 10.03 | $ | 0.65 |
(1) | Represents earnings attributable to holders of unvested restricted shares issued under the Companys 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan. |
10
Table of Contents
4. | Dividends |
The Board of Directors of RenaissanceRe declared, and RenaissanceRe paid, a dividend of $0.24 per common share to shareholders of record on each of March 13, 2009, June 15, 2009 and September 15, 2009.
On May 20, 2008, the Board of Directors publicly announced an increase in the Companys authorized share repurchase program to $500.0 million, of which $382.4 million remained available at October 22, 2009. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Companys Board of Directors, the program will expire when the Company has repurchased the full value of the shares authorized. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 under its authorized share repurchase program. Future repurchases of common shares will depend on, among other matters, the market price of the common shares and the capital requirements of RenaissanceRe. See Part II, Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional information.
5. | Segment Reporting |
The Company conducts its business through two reportable segments, Reinsurance and Individual Risk. The Companys Reinsurance segment provides reinsurance through its catastrophe and specialty units and through joint ventures and other activities managed by its ventures unit. Only ventures business activities that appear in the Companys consolidated underwriting results, such as DaVinci and certain reinsurance transactions, are included in the Companys Reinsurance segment results. The Companys Individual Risk segment provides primary insurance and quota share reinsurance.
The Companys financial results relating to the operating subsidiaries managed by the ventures unit include the financial results of Weather Predict Inc., Weather Predict Consulting Inc., RenRe Energy Advisors Ltd. (REAL), formerly known as RenRe Investment Managers Ltd., and Renaissance Trading Ltd. (Renaissance Trading) and are included in the Other category of the Companys segment results. Also included in the Other category of the Companys segment results are its investments in other ventures, including Top Layer Re, Tower Hill Holdings Inc. (Tower Hill), Tower Hill Insurance Group, LLC, Tower Hill Claims Services, LLC and Tower Hill Claims Management LLC (collectively the Tower Hill Companies), and in respect of the Companys ownership of a warrant to purchase 2.5 million common shares of Platinum Underwriters Holdings Ltd. (Platinum).
The Company does not manage its assets by segment; accordingly, net investment income and total assets are not allocated to the segments.
A summary of the significant components of the Companys revenues and expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
11
Table of Contents
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
Reinsurance | Individual Risk | Eliminations (1) | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 132,487 | $ | 83,349 | $ | (13,423 | ) | $ | | $ | 202,413 | |||||||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 43,202 | $ | 31,896 | | $ | 75,098 | |||||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
$ | 202,260 | $ | 93,753 | | $ | 296,013 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
(15,914 | ) | 54,481 | | 38,567 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
17,164 | 27,039 | | 44,203 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational expenses |
33,961 | 11,537 | | 45,498 | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting income |
$ | 167,049 | $ | 696 | | 167,745 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
106,815 | 106,815 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures |
4,331 | 4,331 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
13,424 | 13,424 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and preference share dividends |
(14,323 | ) | (14,323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(37,694 | ) | (37,694 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other items, net |
1,882 | 1,882 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
16,794 | 16,794 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(346 | ) | (346 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 90,883 | $ | 258,628 | ||||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 46,755 | $ | 62,256 | $ | 109,011 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(62,669 | ) | (7,775 | ) | (70,444 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | (15,914 | ) | $ | 54,481 | $ | 38,567 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
23.1 | % | 66.4 | % | 36.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(31.0 | %) | (8.3 | %) | (23.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
(7.9 | %) | 58.1 | % | 13.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
25.3 | % | 41.2 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
17.4 | % | 99.3 | % | 43.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents gross premiums ceded from the Individual Risk segment to the Reinsurance segment. |
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
Reinsurance | Individual Risk | Eliminations (1) | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 169,463 | $ | 83,685 | $ | (13,342 | ) | $ | | $ | 239,806 | |||||||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 129,229 | $ | 65,179 | | $ | 194,408 | |||||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
$ | 251,058 | $ | 128,284 | | $ | 379,342 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
423,568 | 111,779 | | 535,347 | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
34,469 | 19,762 | | 54,231 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational expenses |
20,602 | 9,694 | | 30,296 | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting loss |
$ | (227,581 | ) | $ | (12,951 | ) | | (240,532 | ) | |||||||||||
Net investment income |
15,767 | 15,767 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures |
2,333 | 2,333 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
2,258 | 2,258 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and preference share dividends |
(15,954 | ) | (15,954 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
91,977 | 91,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other items, net |
787 | 787 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
11,198 | 11,198 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(98,808 | ) | (98,808 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 9,558 | $ | (230,974 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 454,187 | $ | 117,157 | $ | 571,344 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(30,619 | ) | (5,378 | ) | (35,997 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | 423,568 | $ | 111,779 | $ | 535,347 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
180.9 | % | 91.3 | % | 150.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(12.2 | %) | (4.2 | %) | (9.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
168.7 | % | 87.1 | % | 141.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
21.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
190.6 | % | 110.1 | % | 163.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents gross premiums ceded from the Individual Risk segment to the Reinsurance segment. |
12
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
Reinsurance | Individual Risk | Eliminations (1) | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 1,221,035 | $ | 447,229 | $ | (12,378 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,655,886 | |||||||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 852,970 | $ | 300,334 | | $ | 1,153,304 | |||||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
$ | 656,143 | $ | 321,435 | | $ | 977,578 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
(40,132 | ) | 231,719 | | 191,587 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
57,321 | 83,981 | | 141,302 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational expenses |
98,265 | 33,855 | | 132,120 | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting income (loss) |
$ | 540,689 | $ | (28,120 | ) | | 512,569 | |||||||||||||
Net investment income |
263,234 | 263,234 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures |
11,499 | 11,499 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loss |
(5,027 | ) | (5,027 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and preference share dividends |
(43,809 | ) | (43,809 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
(122,821 | ) | (122,821 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other items, net |
(25,162 | ) | (25,162 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
57,809 | 57,809 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(21,201 | ) | (21,201 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | 114,522 | $ | 627,091 | ||||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 143,636 | $ | 217,350 | $ | 360,986 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(183,768 | ) | 14,369 | (169,399 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | (40,132 | ) | $ | 231,719 | $ | 191,587 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
21.9 | % | 67.6 | % | 36.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(28.0 | %) | 4.5 | % | (17.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
(6.1 | %) | 72.1 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
23.7 | % | 36.6 | % | 28.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
17.6 | % | 108.7 | % | 47.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents gross premiums ceded from the Individual Risk segment to the Reinsurance segment. |
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
Reinsurance | Individual Risk | Eliminations (1) | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 1,100,984 | $ | 479,351 | $ | (5,916 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,574,419 | |||||||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 825,336 | $ | 386,210 | | $ | 1,211,546 | |||||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
$ | 709,571 | $ | 355,258 | | $ | 1,064,829 | |||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
490,757 | 240,963 | | 731,720 | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
78,495 | 75,777 | | 154,272 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational expenses |
64,497 | 29,406 | | 93,903 | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting income |
$ | 75,822 | $ | 9,112 | | 84,934 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
106,955 | 106,955 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures |
13,455 | 13,455 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
10,246 | 10,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and preference share dividends |
(49,845 | ) | (49,845 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
10,321 | 10,321 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other items, net |
(11,713 | ) | (11,713 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
28,322 | 28,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(150,763 | ) | (150,763 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
$ | (43,022 | ) | $ | 41,912 | |||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 582,624 | $ | 279,748 | $ | 862,372 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(91,867 | ) | (38,785 | ) | (130,652 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | 490,757 | $ | 240,963 | $ | 731,720 | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
82.1 | % | 78.7 | % | 81.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(12.9 | %) | (10.9 | %) | (12.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
69.2 | % | 67.8 | % | 68.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
20.1 | % | 29.6 | % | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
89.3 | % | 97.4 | % | 92.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents gross premiums ceded from the Individual Risk segment to the Reinsurance segment. |
13
Table of Contents
6. | Investment Related Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Second Quarter of 2009 |
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance under FASB ASC Topic Financial Instruments which extends the disclosure requirements regarding the fair value of financial instruments to interim financial statements of publicly traded companies. This guidance became effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the guidance effective for its interim period ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Also in April 2009, the FASB issued guidance under FASB ASC Topic Financial Instruments on determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and also for identifying transactions that are not orderly. The FASB affirmed that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. If an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly, the entity shall place little, if any, weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Certain disclosure requirements were also expanded. This guidance became effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the guidance effective for its interim period ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Additionally, in April 2009 the FASB issued guidance under FASB ASC Topic Financial Instruments on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. The Company is required to evaluate all of its fixed maturity securities available for sale that are considered impaired at each balance sheet date. A security is considered impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost basis at the measurement date. Prior to the adoption of this new guidance, the Company was required to recognize other-than-temporary impairments in earnings if the Company could not assert that it had the ability and intent to hold its securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. If the impairment was determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment was recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date.
In accordance with the guidance issued in April 2009, the Company now recognizes other-than-temporary impairments in earnings for its impaired fixed maturity securities available for sale (i) for which the Company has the intent to sell the security or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery and (iii) for those securities which have a credit loss. In assessing whether a credit loss exists, the Company compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss exists but the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis, the impairment is separated into (i) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss and (ii) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. In periods after the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments on the Companys fixed maturity securities available for sale, the Company accounts for such securities as if they had been purchased on the measurement date of the other-than-temporary impairment at an amortized cost basis equal to the previous amortized cost basis less the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings. For debt securities in which other-than-temporary impairments were recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected will be amortized into net investment income. The above process became effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009, and is applied to existing and new investments held by the Company as of the beginning of the period in which it is adopted. The Company adopted this new guidance effective April 1, 2009.
14
Table of Contents
Upon adoption of the guidance on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment in retained earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to reclassify certain other-than-temporary impairments previously taken under the former authoritative accounting guidance for securities held as of April 1, 2009, relating to other-than-temporary impairments that did not qualify as such under the new guidance. In accordance with the new guidance, the Company determined that of the $117.8 million in other-than-temporary impairments previously recorded in earnings on fixed maturity investments available for sale held as of April 1, 2009, $76.2 million (net of tax) of these impairments are not considered other-than-temporary impairments. As a result, the Company increased the amortized cost basis of these fixed maturity investments available for sale by $76.6 million, resulting in a $76.2 million (net of tax) decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income and a $76.2 million (net of tax) increase in retained earnings. The cumulative effect adjustment had no net effect on the Companys shareholders equity or previously reported net income (loss). Of the $41.6 million difference between the $117.8 million of other-than-temporary impairments previously recorded in earnings and the $76.2 million cumulative effect adjustment, $20.6 million represents other-than-temporary impairments due to the Companys intent to sell these securities and as of April 1, 2009, $21.0 million represents other-than-temporary impairments due to credit losses.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded $1.4 million of total other-than-temporary impairments of which $0.3 million was recognized in earnings, with the remaining $1.1 million related to all other factors recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Of the $0.3 million of net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2009, $0.3 million relates to credit losses and $nil relates to the Companys intent to sell securities as of September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, fair value and related unrealized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity investments available for sale at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
Included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2009 |
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Non-Credit Other-Than- Temporary Impairments (1) |
||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. treasuries |
$ | 709,262 | $ | 4,746 | $ | (293 | ) | $ | 713,715 | $ | | ||||||
Agencies |
252,836 | 3,760 | (26 | ) | 256,570 | | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government |
112,603 | 10,319 | (165 | ) | 122,757 | (88 | ) | ||||||||||
FDIC guaranteed corporate |
892,871 | 10,420 | (154 | ) | 903,137 | | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government-backed corporate |
224,606 | 3,445 | (333 | ) | 227,718 | | |||||||||||
Corporate |
817,276 | 44,359 | (1,578 | ) | 860,057 | (4,744 | ) | ||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
1,019,302 | 20,926 | (283 | ) | 1,039,945 | | |||||||||||
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
46,908 | 1,790 | (2,519 | ) | 46,179 | (6,303 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
235,753 | 2,188 | (5,888 | ) | 232,053 | | |||||||||||
Asset-backed |
102,011 | 1,885 | (581 | ) | 103,315 | (933 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,413,428 | $ | 103,838 | $ | (11,820 | ) | $ | 4,505,446 | $ | (12,068 | ) | |||||
(1) | Represents the non-credit component of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income since the adoption of guidance related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments under FASB ASC Topic Financial Instruments - Debt and Equity Securities, during the second quarter of 2009, adjusted for subsequent sales of securities. It does not include the change in fair value subsequent to the impairment measurement date. |
15
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2008 |
Included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | |||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
U.S. treasuries |
$ | 462,489 | $ | 4,991 | $ | | $ | 467,480 | ||||
Agencies |
431,527 | 16,994 | | 448,521 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. government |
51,904 | 3,466 | | 55,370 | ||||||||
FDIC guaranteed corporate |
202,064 | 5,329 | | 207,393 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. government-backed corporate |
2,903 | 627 | | 3,530 | ||||||||
Corporate |
515,955 | 22,020 | | 537,975 | ||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
731,679 | 25,223 | | 756,902 | ||||||||
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
98,104 | 568 | | 98,672 | ||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
254,373 | 647 | | 255,020 | ||||||||
Asset-backed |
165,993 | 29 | | 166,022 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,916,991 | $ | 79,894 | $ | | $ | 2,996,885 | ||||
Contractual maturities of fixed maturity investments available for sale are as follows. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
At September 30, 2009 |
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||
Due in less than one year |
$ | 123,668 | $ | 125,570 | ||
Due after one through five years |
2,502,287 | 2,550,285 | ||||
Due after five through ten years |
280,052 | 297,289 | ||||
Due after ten years |
103,447 | 110,810 | ||||
Mortgage-backed |
1,301,963 | 1,318,177 | ||||
Asset-backed |
102,011 | 103,315 | ||||
Total |
$ | 4,413,428 | $ | 4,505,446 | ||
The components of net investment income are as follows:
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||
Fixed maturity investments available for sale |
$ | 44,127 | $ | 52,087 | ||||
Short term investments |
2,285 | 9,990 | ||||||
Other investments |
||||||||
Hedge funds and private equity investments |
15,510 | (15,080 | ) | |||||
Other |
47,748 | (30,306 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
102 | 1,956 | ||||||
109,772 | 18,647 | |||||||
Investment expenses |
(2,957 | ) | (2,880 | ) | ||||
Net investment income |
$ | 106,815 | $ | 15,767 | ||||
16
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||
Fixed maturity investments available for sale |
$ | 123,261 | $ | 147,930 | ||||
Short term investments |
8,097 | 41,124 | ||||||
Other investments |
||||||||
Hedge funds and private equity investments |
8,096 | (46,415 | ) | |||||
Other |
131,309 | (32,884 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
632 | 5,900 | ||||||
271,395 | 115,655 | |||||||
Investment expenses |
(8,161 | ) | (8,700 | ) | ||||
Net investment income |
$ | 263,234 | $ | 106,955 | ||||
Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the first in first out cost method and include adjustments to the cost basis of investments for declines in value that are considered to be other-than-temporary. The analysis of realized gains and net other-than-temporary impairments is as follows:
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||
Gross realized gains |
$ | 26,734 | $ | 20,007 | ||||
Gross realized losses |
(9,940 | ) | (8,809 | ) | ||||
Net realized gains on investments |
$ | 16,794 | $ | 11,198 | ||||
Gross other than temporary impairments |
(1,408 | ) | (98,808 | ) | ||||
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income |
1,062 | | ||||||
Net other than temporary impairments recognized in earnings |
$ | (346 | ) | $ | (98,808 | ) | ||
Nine months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||
Gross realized gains |
$ | 91,370 | $ | 58,885 | ||||
Gross realized losses |
(33,561 | ) | (30,563 | ) | ||||
Net realized gains on investments |
$ | 57,809 | $ | 28,322 | ||||
Total other-than-temporary impairments |
(25,719 | ) | (150,763 | ) | ||||
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income, before taxes |
4,518 | | ||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
$ | (21,201 | ) | $ | (150,763 | ) | ||
17
Table of Contents
The following table provides an analysis of the length of time the Companys fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized loss have been in a continual unrealized loss position. Prior to the adoption of guidance related to the recognition and presentation of other-then-temporary impairments, which became effective for the Company on April 1, 2009, the Company had essentially no fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized loss position:
At September 30, 2009 |
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. treasuries |
$ | 214,736 | $ | (293 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 214,736 | $ | (293 | ) | |||||||
Agencies |
23,889 | (26 | ) | | | 23,889 | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-U.S. government |
5,333 | (126 | ) | 467 | (39 | ) | 5,800 | (165 | ) | ||||||||||||
FDIC guaranteed corporate |
28,543 | (154 | ) | | | 28,543 | (154 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-U.S. government-backed corporate |
22,367 | (333 | ) | | | 22,367 | (333 | ) | |||||||||||||
Corporate |
41,414 | (518 | ) | 21,847 | (1,060 | ) | 63,261 | (1,578 | ) | ||||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
17,748 | (131 | ) | 3,195 | (152 | ) | 20,943 | (283 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
5,256 | (266 | ) | 18,835 | (2,253 | ) | 24,091 | (2,519 | ) | ||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
78,249 | (1,630 | ) | 34,481 | (4,258 | ) | 112,730 | (5,888 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed |
5,776 | (424 | ) | 19,392 | (157 | ) | 25,168 | (581 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 443,311 | $ | (3,901 | ) | $ | 98,217 | $ | (7,919 | ) | $ | 541,528 | $ | (11,820 | ) | ||||||
At September 30, 2009, the Company held 173 fixed maturity investments available for sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position. The Company performed reviews of its investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in order to determine whether declines in the fair value below the amortized cost basis of its fixed maturity investments available for sale were considered other-than-temporary in accordance with the applicable guidance, as discussed below.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Process Prior to April 1, 2009
Under the pre-existing guidance, which was in effect for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company assessed, on a quarterly basis, whether declines in the fair value of its fixed maturity investments available for sale represented impairments that were other-than-temporary based on several factors. The factors the Company considered in the assessment of a security included: (i) the time period during which there had been a significant decline below cost; (ii) the extent of the decline below cost; (iii) the Companys intent and ability to hold the security; (iv) the potential for the security to recover in value; (v) an analysis of the financial condition of the issuer; and (vi) an analysis of the collateral structure and credit support of the security, if applicable. Where the Company determined that there was an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of the security, the cost of the security was written down to its fair value and the unrealized loss at the time of determination was reflected in the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
The majority of the Companys fixed maturity investments available for sale are managed by external investment managers in accordance with specific investment mandates and guidelines. The investment managers are directed to manage the Companys investments to maximize total investment return in accordance with these investment mandates and guidelines. While the Company has adequate capital and liquidity to support its operations and to hold its fixed maturity investments available for sale which were in an unrealized loss position until they recover in value, the Company has not prohibited or restricted its investment managers from selling these investments and its investment managers actively traded the Companys investments. The Company was therefore unable to represent or certify that it had the intent or ability to hold these investments until they recovered in value. As a consequence, under the pre-existing guidance the Company impaired essentially all of its fixed maturity investments available for sale that were in an unrealized loss position at each quarterly reporting date. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, and the nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $19.0 million and $150.8 million, respectively. As of each of March 31, 2009, and September 30, 2008, respectively, the Company had essentially no fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized loss position.
18
Table of Contents
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Process Effective April 1, 2009
Pursuant to the guidance effective April 1, 2009, the Company revised its quarterly process for assessing whether declines in the fair value of its fixed maturity investments available for sale represent impairments that are other-than-temporary. The process now includes reviewing each fixed maturity investment available for sale that is impaired and determining: (i) if the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or (ii) if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery; and (iii) assessing whether a credit loss exists, that is, where the Company expects that the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security are less than the amortized cost basis of the security.
In assessing the Companys intent to sell securities, the Companys procedures may include actions such as discussing planned sales with its third party investment managers, reviewing sales that have occurred shortly after the balance sheet date, and consideration of other qualitative factors that may be indicative of the Companys intent to sell or hold the relevant securities. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $nil and $0.2 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments due to the Companys intent to sell these securities as of September 30, 2009.
In assessing whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell a security before its anticipated recovery, the Company considers various factors including its future cash flow forecasts and requirements, legal and regulatory requirements, the level of its cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized gain position, and other relevant factors. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $nil and $nil, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments due to required sales.
In evaluating credit losses, the Company considers a variety of factors in the assessment of a security including: (i) the time period during which there has been a significant decline below cost; (ii) the extent of the decline below cost and par; (iii) the potential for the security to recover in value; (iv) an analysis of the financial condition of the issuer; (v) the rating of the issuer; (vi) the implied rating of the issuer based on an analysis of option adjusted spreads; (vii) the absolute level of the option adjusted spread for the issuer; and (viii) an analysis of the collateral structure and credit support of the security, if applicable.
Once the Company determines that it is possible that a credit loss may exist for a security, the Company performs a detailed review of the cash flows expected to be collected from the issuer. The Company estimates expected cash flows by applying estimated default probabilities and recovery rates to the contractual cash flows of the issuer, with such default and recovery rates reflecting long term historical averages adjusted to reflect current credit, economic and market conditions, giving due consideration to collateral and credit support, if applicable, and discounting the expected cash flows at the purchase yield on the security. In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss exists but the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis, the impairment is separated into: (i) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss; and (ii) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $0.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of credit related other-than-temporary impairments which were recognized in earnings and $1.1 million and $4.5 million, respectively, related to other factors which were recognized in other comprehensive income.
19
Table of Contents
The following table provides a rollforward of the amount of other-than-temporary impairments related to credit losses recognized in earnings for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||
Balance - July 1, 2009 |
$ | 11,995 | ||
Additions: |
||||
Amount related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
| |||
Amount related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized |
346 | |||
Reductions: |
||||
Securities sold during the period |
(3,765 | ) | ||
Securities for which the amount previously recognized in other comprehensive income was recognized in earnings, because the Company intends to sell the security or is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security |
| |||
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security |
| |||
Balance - September 30, 2009 |
$ | 8,576 | ||
Six months ended September 30, 2009 (1) |
||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||
Balance - April 1, 2009 |
$ | 10,620 | ||
Additions: |
||||
Amount related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
3 | |||
Amount related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized |
1,718 | |||
Reductions: |
||||
Securities sold during the period |
(3,765 | ) | ||
Securities for which the amount previously recognized in other comprehensive income was recognized in earnings, because the Company intends to sell the security or is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security |
| |||
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security |
| |||
Balance - September 30, 2009 |
$ | 8,576 | ||
(1) | Table is for the six months ended September 30, 2009, rather than the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as updated guidance related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments under FASB ASC Topic Financial Instruments - Debt and Equity Securities, became effective April 1, 2009 for the Company. |
20
Table of Contents
7. | Fair Value Measurements |
The use of fair value to measure certain assets and liabilities with resulting unrealized gains or losses is pervasive within the Companys financial statements, and is a critical accounting policy and estimate for the Company. Fair value is defined under accounting guidance currently applicable to the Company to be the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between open market participants at the measurement date. The Company recognizes the change in unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value in its consolidated statements of operations, with the exception of changes in unrealized gains and losses on its fixed maturity investments available for sale, which are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders equity.
FASB ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures prescribes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the respective valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
| Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices obtained from active markets for identical assets or liabilities for which the Company has access to. The fair value is determined by multiplying the quoted price by the quantity held by the Company; |
| Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, broker quotes and certain pricing indices; and |
| Level 3 inputs are based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In these cases, significant management assumptions can be used to establish managements best estimate of the assumptions used by other market participants in determining the fair value of the asset or liability. |
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and the Company considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
There have been no material changes in the Companys valuation techniques in the period represented by these interim financial statements.
21
Table of Contents
Below is a summary of the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and also represents the carrying amount on the Companys consolidated balance sheet:
At September 30, 2009 |
Total |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturity investments available for sale |
$ | 4,505,446 | $ | 713,715 | $ | 3,791,731 | $ | | |||||
Short term investments |
880,406 | | 880,406 | | |||||||||
Other investments |
812,056 | | 426,712 | 385,344 | |||||||||
Other secured assets |
27,464 | | 27,464 | | |||||||||
Other assets and (liabilities) (1) |
36,304 | 10,879 | 29,031 | (3,606 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 6,261,676 | $ | 724,594 | $ | 5,155,344 | $ | 381,738 | ||||||
(1) | Other assets of $17.8 million, $29.5 million and $23.8 million are included in Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. Other liabilities of $6.9 million, $0.4 million and $27.4 million are included in Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. |
Fixed maturity investments available for sale included in Level 1 consist of the Companys investments in U.S. treasuries. Fixed maturity investments available for sale included in Level 2 are U.S. agencies, non-U.S. government, corporate, FDIC guaranteed corporate, non-U.S. government-backed corporate, mortgage-backed and asset-backed fixed maturity investments available for sale.
The Companys fixed maturity investments available for sale portfolio is priced using broker quotations and pricing services, such as index providers and pricing vendors. The pricing vendors provide pricing for a high volume of liquid securities that are actively traded. For securities that do not trade on an exchange, the pricing services generally utilize market data and other observable inputs in matrix pricing models to determine prices. Prices are generally verified using third party data. Prices obtained from broker quotations are considered non-binding, however they are based on observable inputs and by observing secondary trading of similar securities obtained from active, non-distressed markets. The Company considers these Level 2 inputs as they are corroborated with other externally obtained information.
Short term investments are considered Level 2 and fair values are generally determined using amortized cost which approximates fair value and, in certain cases, in a manner similar to the Companys fixed maturity investments available for sale noted above.
The Companys other investments currently include investments in hedge funds, catastrophe bonds, a non-U.S. dollar fixed income fund and a bank loan fund for which the Company can redeem a portion of its investment on a monthly basis, all of which are included in Level 2. In addition, the Companys other investments currently include investments in private equity partnership investments and another bank loan fund, for which the Companys investments are subject to lock-up provisions for the multi-year term of these fund investments, and as such these investments are included in Level 3. Fair value estimates for the majority of the Companys other investments included in Level 2 are derived using net asset valuations provided by third parties such as the relevant investment manager or administrator, recent financial information issued by the applicable investee entity or available market data to estimate fair value. In certain cases, managements judgment may also be required to estimate fair value. The fair value of private equity partnership investments is based on net asset values obtained from the investment manager or general partner of the respective entity. The type of underlying investments held by the investee which form the basis of the net asset valuation include assets such as private business ventures, for which the Company does not have access to, and as a result, is unable to corroborate the fair value measurement and therefore requires significant management judgment to determine the underlying value of the private equity partnership and accordingly the fair value of the Companys investment in each
22
Table of Contents
private equity partnership is considered Level 3. The Company also considers factors such as recent financial information, the value of capital transactions with the partnership and managements judgment regarding whether any adjustments should be made to the net asset value. The Company regularly reviews the performance of its private equity partnerships directly with the fund managers. The Companys investment in the bank loan fund which is subject to a multi-year lock up provision is valued using monthly net asset valuations received from the investment manager. The underlying investments in this bank loan fund are relatively liquid and prices can be obtained on a daily basis. However, the lock up provisions in this fund result in a lack of current observable market transactions between the fund participants and the fund, and therefore, the Company considers the fair value of its investment in this fund to be determined using Level 3 inputs.
Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, for the periods shown, of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs. Interest and dividend income are included in net investment income and are excluded from the reconciliation.
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||
Other investments (1) |
Other assets and (liabilities) (2) |
Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Balance June 30 |
$ | 397,464 | $ | 22,491 | $ | 419,955 | ||||||
Total unrealized gains (losses) |
||||||||||||
Included in net investment income |
(17,452 | ) | | (17,452 | ) | |||||||
Included in other (loss) income |
| (4,532 | ) | (4,532 | ) | |||||||
Total realized gains (losses) |
||||||||||||
Included in net investment income |
| | | |||||||||
Included in other (loss) income |
| 7,269 | 7,269 | |||||||||
Total foreign exchange (losses) gains |
1,227 | (232 | ) | 995 | ||||||||
Net purchases, issuances, and settlements |
4,105 | (28,602 | ) | (24,497 | ) | |||||||
Net transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Balance September 30 |
$ | 385,344 | $ | (3,606 | ) | $ | 381,738 | |||||
(1) | Other investments primarily include investments in private equity partnerships and a senior secured bank loan fund. |
(2) | Balance at September 30, 2009, includes $13.5 million of other assets and $17.1 million of other liabilities. |
23
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||
Other investments (1) |
Other assets and (liabilities) (2) |
Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
$ | 382,080 | $ | (42,512 | ) | $ | 339,568 | |||||
Total unrealized gains (losses) |
||||||||||||
Included in net investment income |
(17,981 | ) | | (17,981 | ) | |||||||
Included in other (loss) income |
| 20,433 | 20,433 | |||||||||
Total realized gains (losses) |
||||||||||||
Included in net investment income |
| | | |||||||||
Included in other (loss) income |
| (18,487 | ) | (18,487 | ) | |||||||
Total foreign exchange (losses) gains |
847 | 17 | 864 | |||||||||
Net purchases, issuances, and settlements |
20,398 | 36,943 | 57,341 | |||||||||
Net transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Balance September 30 |
$ | 385,344 | $ | (3,606 | ) | $ | 381,738 | |||||
(1) | Other investments primarily include investments in private equity partnerships and a senior secured bank loan fund. |
(2) | Balance at September 30, 2009, includes $13.5 million of other assets and $17.1 million of other liabilities. |
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The Company has elected to account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value under FASB ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. These assets and liabilities were previously accounted for under applicable GAAP that resulted in a carrying value that approximated fair value, and as such, there were no material changes to the reported value of these assets and liabilities upon adoption of the fair value option. The Company has elected to use the guidance under FASB ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as it represents the most current authoritative GAAP. Below is a summary of the balances the Company has elected to account for at fair value:
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||
Other investments |
$ | 812,056 | $ | 773,475 | |||
Other secured assets |
27,464 | 76,424 | |||||
Other assets and (liabilities) (1) |
$ | 2,144 | $ | (11,209 | ) |
(1) | Balance at September 30, 2009 includes $12.6 million of other assets and $10.4 million of other liabilities. Balance at December 31, 2008 includes $2.8 million of other assets and $14.0 million of other liabilities. |
Included in net investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 is $19.2 million and $71.4 million, respectively, of net unrealized gains related to the changes in fair value of other investments. Net unrealized gains related to the changes in the fair value of other secured assets and other assets and liabilities recorded in other income (loss) was $1.0 million and $2.1, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and $1.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
24
Table of Contents
Reinsurance Contracts Accounted for at Fair Value
The Company assumes and cedes certain reinsurance contracts that are accounted for at fair value under the fair value election option. The fair value of these contracts is obtained through the use of internal valuation models. These contracts are recorded on the Companys balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities and totaled $12.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded losses of $14.9 million and $22.3 million, respectively, which are included in other income (loss) and represents changes in the fair value of these contracts.
Insurance Contracts Accounted for at Fair Value
The Company assumes certain insurance contracts that are accounted for at fair value under the fair value election option. The fair value of these contracts is obtained through the use of internal valuation models. These contracts are recorded on the Companys balance sheet in other liabilities and totaled $9.8 million at September 30, 2009. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $2.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, which are included in other income (loss) and represents changes in the fair value of these contracts.
Senior Notes
In January 2003, the Company issued $100.0 million, which represents the carrying amount on the Companys consolidated balance sheet, of 5.875% Senior Notes due February 15, 2013, with interest on the notes payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The notes can be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity subject to payment of a make-whole premium. The notes, which are senior obligations, contain various covenants, including limitations on mergers and consolidations, restrictions as to the disposition of the stock of designated subsidiaries and limitations on liens of the stock of designated subsidiaries. At September 30, 2009, the fair value of the 5.875% Senior Notes was $101.7 million, compared to $93.3 million at December 31, 2008.
8. | Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements |
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued guidance under FASB ASC Topic Business Combinations which significantly changed the accounting for and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. The scope of acquisition accounting was expanded to all transactions and circumstances under which control of a business is obtained. Under the new guidance, noncontrolling interests are to be classified as a component of consolidated shareholders equity and minority interest accounting no longer applies such that earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are reported as part of consolidated earnings and not as a separate component of income or expense. This guidance is required to be adopted simultaneously and became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009.
As a result of the new guidance, FASB ASC Topic Consolidation was also amended to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The primary objectives of the amendment, among other items, are to clearly identify, label and present the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent on the face of the financial statements, provide guidance when dealing with changes in a parents ownership and provide guidance when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Specifically, the Company was impacted by the disclosure and presentation requirements of the amendments to FASB ASC Topic Consolidation, effective January 1, 2009. The amendments are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year, January 1, 2009, except the presentation and disclosures shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
The updated guidance discussed above under FASB ASC Topic Consolidations, prescribes moving Minority Interest DaVinciRe from the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheet, to a line item, separate from the parents equity, in the shareholders equity section of the consolidated balance sheet. However, the Company is subject to the requirements of certain Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidance that interprets Rule 5-02.28 of Regulation S-X, which is applicable only to SEC registrants. Rule 5-02.28 requires shares, not required to be accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic Distinguishing
25
Table of Contents
Liabilities from Equity, having redemption features that are not solely within the control of the issuer to be classified outside of permanent equity in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet. Because the share classes related to the noncontrolling interest portion of DaVinciRe are not considered liabilities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and have redemption features that are not solely within the control of DaVinciRe, the noncontrolling interest in DaVinciRe is disclosed in the mezzanine section on the Companys consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the SEC guidance noted above. The minority interest line item has been renamed to Redeemable noncontrolling interest DaVinciRe. The SEC guidance does not impact the accounting for noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statements of operations; therefore, the provisions of FASB ASC Topic Consolidation with respect to the consolidated statements of operations still apply.
In addition, the updated guidance under FASB ASC Topic Consolidation, prescribes additional disclosures on the Companys consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity, to provide increased transparency of the impact of noncontrolling interests on the Companys results of operations and financial position.
The activity in the Companys redeemable noncontrolling interest DaVinciRe is detailed in the table below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
|||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||
Balance - July 1, 2009 |
$ | 700,562 | ||
Comprehensive income: |
||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
37,694 | |||
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
8,442 | |||
Balance - September 30, 2009 |
$ | 746,698 | ||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - DaVinciRe |
|||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||
Balance - January 1, 2009 |
$ | 768,531 | ||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes (1) |
42 | |||
Purchase of shares from redeemable noncontrolling interest |
(152,728 | ) | ||
Comprehensive income: |
||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
122,821 | |||
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
8,032 | |||
Balance - September 30, 2009 |
$ | 746,698 | ||
(1) | Cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of April 1, 2009, related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, as required by the InvestmentsDebt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB ASC. |
26
Table of Contents
In addition to the amendments noted above, FASB ASC Topic Earnings per Share was amended so that earnings per share data will continue to be calculated based on amounts attributable to the Company, both before and after the adoption of the guidance under FASB ASC Topic Consolidation.
9. | Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance updating FASB ASC Topic Derivatives and Hedging which requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic Derivatives and Hedging and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Pursuant to this guidance, qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments, are now required. The guidance is required to be applied prospectively and became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. In years after initial adoption, comparative disclosures are required only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The updated guidance is disclosure-based and as such did not impact the Companys consolidated statements of operations or financial condition.
The Company enters into derivative instruments such as futures, options, swaps, forward contracts and other derivative contracts in order to manage its foreign currency exposure, obtain exposure to a particular financial market, for yield enhancement, or for trading and speculation. The Company accounts for its derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC Topic Derivatives and Hedging, which requires all derivatives to be recorded at fair value on the Companys balance sheet as either assets or liabilities, depending on the rights or obligations of the derivatives, with changes in fair value reflected in current earnings. The Company does not currently apply hedge accounting in respect of any positions reflected in its consolidated financial statements. The fair value of the Companys derivatives are estimated by reference to quoted prices or broker quotes, where available, or in the absence of quoted prices or broker quotes, the use of industry or internal valuation models.
The Company principally has exposure to derivatives related to the following types of risks: interest rate risk; foreign currency risk; credit risk; energy and weather-related risk; and equity price risk.
Interest Rate Futures
The Company uses interest rate futures within its portfolio of fixed maturity investments available for sale to manage its exposure to interest rate risk, which can include increasing or decreasing its exposure to this risk. At September 30, 2009, the Company had $2.4 billion of notional long positions and $nil of notional short positions of primarily Eurodollar futures contracts and non-U.S. dollar futures contracts. The fair value of these derivatives as recognized in other assets and liabilities in its consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009, was $0.2 million and $nil, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded gains of $3.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, in its consolidated statement of operations related to these derivatives. The fair value of these derivatives is determined using exchange traded prices.
Foreign Currency Derivatives
The Companys functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The Company writes a portion of its business in currencies other than U.S. dollars and may, from time to time, experience foreign exchange gains and losses, other income (loss) and incur underwriting (income) losses in currencies other than U.S. dollars, which will in turn affect the Companys consolidated financial statements. All changes in exchange rates, with the exception of non-U.S. dollar denominated investments classified as available for sale, are recognized currently in the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
27
Table of Contents
Underwriting Operations Related Foreign Currency Contracts
The Companys foreign currency policy with regard to its underwriting operations is generally to hold foreign currency assets, including cash, investments and receivables that approximate the foreign currency liabilities, including claims and claim expense reserves and reinsurance balances payable. When necessary, the Company will use foreign currency forward and option contracts to minimize the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on the value of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities associated with its underwriting operations. At September 30, 2009, the total notional amount in United States dollars of the Companys underwriting related foreign currency contracts was $nil. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred a loss of $0.8 million and generated income of $0.9 million, respectively, on its foreign currency forward and option contracts related to its underwriting operations.
Investment Portfolio Related Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
The Companys investment operations are exposed to currency fluctuations through its investments in non-U.S. dollar fixed maturity investments, short term investments and other investments. To economically hedge its exposure to currency fluctuations from these investments, the Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts. Foreign exchange gains (losses) associated with the Companys hedging of these non-U.S. dollar investments are recorded in net foreign exchange gains (losses) in its consolidated statements of operations. At September 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding investment portfolio related foreign currency contracts of $228.3 million in short positions and $95.0 million in long positions, denominated in U.S. dollars. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a loss of $5.9 million and $9.1 million, respectively, related to its foreign currency forward contracts entered into to seek to economically hedge the Companys non-U.S. dollar investments.
Energy and Risk Operations Related Foreign Currency Contracts
The Companys energy and risk operations are exposed to currency fluctuations through certain derivative transactions it enters into that are denominated in non-U.S. dollars. When necessary, the Company will use foreign currency forward and option contracts to minimize the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on the value of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities associated with its operations. At September 30, 2009, the total notional amount in United States dollars of the Companys underwriting related foreign currency contracts was $11.2 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company generated income of $0.3 million and incurred a loss of $0.4 million, respectively, on its foreign currency forward and option contracts related to its operations.
Credit Derivatives
The Companys exposure to credit risk is primarily due to its fixed maturity investments available for sale, short term investments, premiums receivable and ceded reinsurance balances. From time to time, the Company purchases credit derivatives to hedge its exposures in the insurance industry, to assist in managing the credit risk associated with ceded reinsurance, or to assume credit risk. The fair value of the credit derivatives are determined using industry valuation models. The fair value of these credit derivatives can change based on a variety of factors including changes in credit spreads, default rates and recovery rates, the correlation of credit risk between the referenced credit and the counterparty, and market rate inputs such as interest rates. The fair value of these credit derivatives, as recognized in other liabilities in the Companys balance sheet, at September 30, 2009 was $0.4 million. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a gain of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, which are included in other income (loss) and represent net settlements and changes in the fair value of these credit derivatives.
28
Table of Contents
Energy and Weather-Related Derivatives
The Company, through Renaissance Trading, transacts certain derivative-based risk management products primarily to address weather and energy risks and engages in hedging and trading activities related to these risks. The trading markets for these derivatives are generally linked to energy and agriculture commodities, weather and other natural phenomena. Currently, a significant percentage of the Companys derivative-based risk management products are transacted on a dual-trigger basis combining weather or other natural phenomenon, with prices for commodities or securities related to energy or agriculture. The fair value of these contracts is obtained through the use of quoted market prices, or in the absence of such quoted prices, industry or internal valuation models. These contracts are recorded on the Companys balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities and totaled $28.1 million and $18.5 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company generated income related to these derivatives of $18.1 million and $35.3 million, respectively, which is included in other income (loss) and represents net settlements and changes in the fair value of these contracts. Any realized gains or losses are included in the calculation. Generally, the Companys current portfolio of such derivative contracts are of comparably short duration and are frequently seasonal in nature. It is possible the duration of derivative contracts in this portfolio will lengthen in the future.
At September 30, 2009, the Company had the following gross derivative contract positions outstanding relating to its energy and weather derivatives trading activities.
Trading activity |
Quantity (1) |
Unit of measurement |
||
Weather |
1,550,389 | $ per Degree Day | ||
Weather |
137,000 | £ per Degree Day | ||
Heating oil |
168,809,627 | Gallons | ||
Natural gas |
11,562,750 | One million British thermal units (MMBTUs) | ||
Crude oil |
1,075,000 | Barrels | ||
Power |
1,000,860 | Megawatts per hour (MWhr) | ||
Precipitation |
2,000,000 | $ (single contract) | ||
Corn |
3,095,000 | Bushels | ||
Soybeans |
3,025,000 | Bushels | ||
Power |
12,000,000 | AU$ (single contract) |
(1) | Represents the sum of gross long and gross short derivative contracts. |
The Company uses value-at-risk (VaR) analysis to monitor the risks associated with its energy and weather derivatives trading portfolio. VaR is a tool that measures the potential loss that could occur if the Companys trading positions were maintained over a defined period of time, calculated at a given statistical confidence level. Due to the seasonal nature of the Companys energy and weather derivatives trading activities, the VaR is based on a rolling two season (one-year) holding period assuming no dynamic trading during the holding period. A 99% confidence level is used for the VaR analysis. A 99% confidence level implies that within a one-year period, the potential loss in the Companys portfolio is not expected to exceed the VaR estimate in 99% of the possible modeled outcomes. In the remaining estimated 1% of the possible outcomes, the anticipated potential loss is expected to be higher than the VaR figure, and on average substantially higher.
The VaR model, based on a Monte Carlo simulation methodology, seeks to take into account correlations between different positions and potential for movements to offset one another within the portfolio. The expected value of the risk factors in the Companys portfolio are generally obtained from exchange-traded futures markets. For most of the risk factors, the volatility is derived from exchange-traded options markets. For those risk factors for which exchange-traded options might not exist, the volatility is based on historical analysis matched to broker quotes from the over-the-counter market, where available. The joint distribution of
29
Table of Contents
outcomes is based on the Companys estimate of the historical seasonal dependence among the underlying risk factors, scaled to the current market levels. Management then estimates the expected outcomes by applying a Monte Carlo simulation to these risk factors. The joint distribution of the simulated risk factors is then filtered through the portfolio positions, and then the distribution of the outcomes is realized. The 99th percentile of this distribution is then calculated as the portfolio VaR. The major limitation of this methodology is that the market data used to forecast parameters of the model may not be an appropriate proxy of those parameters. The VaR methodology uses a number of assumptions, such as (i) risks are measured under average market conditions, assuming normal distribution of market risk factors, (ii) future movements in market risk factors follow estimated historical movements, and (iii) the assessed exposures do not change during the holding period. There is no guarantee that these assumptions will prove correct. The Company expects that, for any given period, its actual results will differ from its assumptions, including with respect to previously estimated potential losses and that such losses could be substantially higher than the estimated VaR.
At September 30, 2009, the estimated VaR for the Companys portfolio of energy and weather-related derivatives, as described above, calculated at an estimated 99% confidence level, was $16.0 million. The average, low and high amounts calculated by the Companys VaR analysis during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $17.4 million, $0.1 million and $41.7 million, respectively.
Platinum Warrant
The Company holds a warrant, which expires on October 30, 2012, to purchase up to 2.5 million common shares of Platinum for $27.00 per share. The Company has recorded its investment in the Platinum warrant at fair value. At September 30, 2009, the fair value of the warrant was $29.5 million. The fair value of the warrant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, gains of $12.8 million and losses of $0.5 million were recorded in other income (loss), respectively, representing the change in the fair value of the warrant.
The table below shows the location on the consolidated balance sheet and fair value of the Companys principal derivative instruments:
Derivative Assets |
Derivative Liabilities |
|||||||||
At September 30, 2009 |
Balance Sheet |
Fair Value |
Balance Sheet |
Fair Value |
||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||
Interest rate futures |
Other assets | $ | 181 | Other liabilities | $ | 35 | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts (1) |
Other assets | | Other liabilities | | ||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts (2) |
Other liabilities | 3,272 | Other liabilities | 8,373 | ||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts (3) |
Other assets | 368 | Other liabilities | | ||||||
Credit default swaps |
Other assets | | Other liabilities | 433 | ||||||
Energy and weather contracts (4) |
Other assets | 28,081 | Other liabilities | 18,492 | ||||||
Platinum warrant |
Other assets | 29,453 | Other liabilities | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 61,355 | $ | 27,333 | ||||||
(1) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in underwriting and non-investment operations. |
(2) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in investment operations. |
(3) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in energy and risk operations. |
(4) | Included in other assets is $70.6 million of derivative assets and $42.6 million of derivative liabilities. Included in other liabilities is $12.3 million of derivative assets and $31.1 million of derivative liabilities. |
30
Table of Contents
The location and amount of the gain (loss) recognized in the Companys consolidated statement of operations related to its derivative instruments is shown in the following table:
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
Location of gain (loss) recognized on derivatives |
Amount of gain (loss) recognized on derivatives |
||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||
Interest rate futures |
Net investment income | $ | 3,638 | |||
Foreign currency forward contracts (1) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | (785 | ) | |||
Foreign currency forward contracts (2) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | (5,854 | ) | |||
Foreign currency forward contracts (3) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | 303 | ||||
Credit default swaps |
Other income (loss) | 353 | ||||
Energy and weather contracts |
Other income (loss) | 18,141 | ||||
Platinum warrant |
Other income (loss) | 12,839 | ||||
Total |
$ | 28,635 | ||||
(1) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in underwriting operations. |
(2) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in investment operations. |
(3) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in energy and risk operations. |
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
Location of gain (loss) recognized on derivatives |
Amount of gain (loss) recognized on derivatives |
||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||
Interest rate futures |
Net investment income | $ | 2,086 | |||
Foreign currency forward contracts (1) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | 917 | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts (2) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | (9,060 | ) | |||
Foreign currency forward contracts (3) |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) | (354 | ) | |||
Credit default swaps |
Other income (loss) | 429 | ||||
Energy and weather contracts |
Other income (loss) | 35,318 | ||||
Platinum warrant |
Other income (loss) | (461 | ) | |||
Total |
$ | 28,875 | ||||
(1) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in underwriting operations. |
(2) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in investment operations. |
(3) | Contracts used to manage foreign currency risks in energy and risk operations. |
The Company is not aware of the existence of any credit-risk related contingent features that it believes would be triggered in its derivative instruments that are in a net liability position at September 30, 2009.
31
Table of Contents
10. | Litigation |
There are no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as updated in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
The Companys operating subsidiaries are subject to claims litigation involving disputed interpretations of policy coverages. Generally, the Companys primary insurance operations are subject to greater frequency and diversity of claims and claims-related litigation and, in some jurisdictions, may be subject to direct actions by allegedly injured persons or entities seeking damages from policyholders. These lawsuits, involving claims on policies issued by the Companys subsidiaries which are typical to the insurance industry in general and in the normal course of business, are considered in its reserves for claims and claim expenses which are discussed in more detail below under Reserves for Claims and Claim Expenses. In addition to claims litigation, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to lawsuits and regulatory actions in the normal course of business that do not arise from or directly relate to claims on insurance policies. This category of business litigation may involve allegations of underwriting or claims-handling errors or misconduct, employment claims, regulatory activity or disputes arising from the Companys business ventures. Any such litigation or arbitration contains an element of uncertainty, and the Company believes the inherent uncertainty in such matters may have increased recently and will likely continue to increase. Currently, the Company believes that no individual, normal course litigation or arbitration to which the Company is presently a party is likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, business or operations.
11. | Timicuan Reinsurance II Ltd. (Tim Re II) |
On May 29, 2009, Tim Re II, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, sold $49.5 million of non-voting Class B shares to external investors, and the Company invested an additional $10.0 million in the non-voting Class B shares, representing a 16.8% ownership interest, providing Tim Re II with additional reinsurance capacity to accept property catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance business. Tim Re II is a Class 3 Bermuda domiciled reinsurer. The Company ceded a defined portfolio of property catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance contracts incepting June 1, 2009 to Tim Re II under a fully-collateralized facultative retrocessional reinsurance contract in return for a potential underwriting profit commission. The Class B shareholders will participate in substantially all of the profits or losses of Tim Re II while the Class B shares remain outstanding. The Class B shares indemnify Tim Re II against losses relating to insurance risk and therefore these shares have been accounted for as prospective reinsurance under FASB ASC Topic Financial Services Insurance. The sale of the Class B shares was considered a reconsideration event under FASB ASC Topic Consolidation. In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic Consolidation, Tim Re II is considered a variable interest entity (VIE) and the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. As a result, Tim Re II is consolidated by the Company and all significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated. The Class B share capital has been invested by Tim Re II in short term investments and is pledged as collateral to the Company in support of obligations arising under the reinsurance contract. Tim Re II is required to repurchase the Class B shares subsequent to December 31, 2009, which is the end of the contract period. The Company ceded $41.8 million of premium to Tim Re II under the facultative retrocessional excess of loss reinsurance contract through the period ended September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the Companys consolidated balance sheet included assets and liabilities of $122.3 million and $116.3 million, respectively, related to Tim Re II, principally reflecting reinsurance underwriting balances and investments with respect to assets and amounts payable to Class B shareholders and a reserve for unearned premiums with respect to liabilities.
12. | Entry into Lloyds |
In May 2009, the Company established RenaissanceRe Syndicate 1458 (Syndicate 1458), a Lloyds syndicate, to start writing certain lines of insurance and reinsurance business incepting on or after June 1, 2009. The syndicate was established to enhance the Companys underwriting platform by providing the Company with access to Lloyds extensive distribution network and worldwide licenses. The Company has contracted with Spectrum Syndicate Management Ltd. (Spectrum) to be the managing agent of Syndicate 1458. RenaissanceRe CCL, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole corporate member of Syndicate 1458.
32
Table of Contents
As previously disclosed, on June 4, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive agreement granting the Company an option to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Spectrum Partners Ltd. (Spectrum Partners), the parent company and sole owner of Spectrum. The Company currently expects to exercise its option to acquire Spectrum and, subject to specified closing conditions, to complete the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2009.
13. | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (FAS 168). Effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 the FASB ASC (the Codification) is now the authoritative source of U.S. GAAP. The Codification changes the structure of authoritative guidance to a Topic based model versus the previous model of Original Pronouncements, modified by Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts, FASB Staff Positions, etc. Among other things, the Codification is expected to: reduce the amount of time and effort required to solve an accounting research issue; mitigate the risk of noncompliance through improved usability of the literature; provide accurate information with real-time updates as Accounting Standards Updates are released; and assist the FASB with research and convergence efforts.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (FAS 166). The objective of FAS 166 is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. FAS 166 must be applied as of the beginning of the reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. FAS 166 must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. Additionally, the disclosure provisions of FAS 166 should be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impacts of adoption of FAS 166 on its consolidated statements of operations and financial condition.
Also in June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167). The objective of FAS 167 is to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The FASB undertook this project to address (1) the effects on certain provisions of FIN 46(R), as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FAS 166, and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of FIN 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. FAS 167 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impacts of adoption of FAS 167 on its consolidated statements of operations and financial condition.
33
Table of Contents
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent) (ASU 2009-12) which amends FASB ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2009-12 provides additional guidance on estimating the fair value of certain alternative investments, such as hedge funds, private equity investments and venture capital funds. The updated guidance allows the fair value of such investments to be determined using the net asset value (NAV) as a practical expedient, unless it is probable the investment will be sold at a value other than the NAV. In addition, the guidance requires disclosures by major category of investment regarding the attributes of the investments within the scope of the guidance, regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the NAV or other fair value technique. ASU 2009-12 shall be effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been issued. If an entity elects to early adopt the measurement amendments in this update, the entity is permitted to defer the adoption of the disclosure provisions until periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impacts of adoption of ASU 2009-12 on its consolidated statements of operations and financial condition.
14. | Subsequent Events |
The Company has completed its subsequent events evaluation for the period subsequent to the balance sheet date of September 30, 2009, through October 28, 2009, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.
34
Table of Contents
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The following also includes a discussion of our financial condition at September 30, 2009. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the attached unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. This filing contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the results described or implied by these forward-looking statements. See Note on Forward-Looking Statements.
OVERVIEW
RenaissanceRe, established in Bermuda in 1993 to write principally property catastrophe reinsurance, is today a leading global provider of reinsurance and insurance coverages and related services. Through our operating subsidiaries, we seek to obtain a portfolio of reinsurance, insurance and financial risks in each of our businesses that is significantly better than the market average and produce an attractive return on equity. We accomplish this by leveraging our core capabilities of risk assessment and information management, and by investing in our capabilities to serve our customers across the cycles that have historically characterized our markets. Overall, our strategy focuses on superior risk selection, marketing, capital management and joint ventures. We provide value to our clients and joint venture partners in the form of financial security, innovative products, and responsive service. We are known as a leader in paying valid reinsurance claims promptly. We principally measure our financial success through long-term growth in tangible book value per common share plus accumulated dividends, which we believe is the most appropriate measure of our Companys performance, and believe we have delivered superior performance in respect of this measure over time.
Since a substantial portion of the reinsurance and insurance we write provides protection from damages relating to natural and man-made catastrophes, our results depend to a large extent on the frequency and severity of such catastrophic events, and the coverages we offer to clients affected by these events. We are exposed to significant losses from these catastrophic events and other exposures that we cover. Accordingly, we expect a significant degree of volatility in our financial results and our financial results may vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter or from year-to-year, based, among other things, on the level of insured catastrophic losses occurring around the world.
Our revenues are principally derived from three sources: 1) net premiums earned from the reinsurance and insurance policies we sell; 2) net investment income and realized gains from the investment of our capital funds and the investment of the cash we receive on the policies which we sell; and 3) other income received from our joint ventures, advisory services, weather and energy risk operations and various other items.
Our expenses primarily consist of: 1) net claims and claim expenses incurred on the policies of reinsurance and insurance we sell; 2) acquisition costs which typically represent a percentage of the premiums we write; 3) operating expenses which primarily consist of personnel expenses, rent and other operating expenses; 4) corporate expenses which include certain executive, legal and consulting expenses, costs for research and development, and other miscellaneous costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company; and 5) interest expense related to our debt. In addition, in calculating net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders, a portion of the Companys net income (loss) is attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest holders in DaVinciRe, as well as dividends on the Companys preference shares. We are also subject to taxes in certain jurisdictions in which we operate; however, since the majority of our income is currently earned in Bermuda, a non-taxable jurisdiction, the tax impact to our operations has historically been minimal. We currently expect our growth outside of Bermuda to result in a higher effective tax rate in 2009 and future periods compared with our historical results. Our future effective tax rate may also be impacted adversely by legislative or regulatory changes in the key markets to which we provide coverages and services.
The operating results, also known as the underwriting results, of an insurance or reinsurance company are discussed frequently by reference to its net claims and claim expense ratio, underwriting expense ratio, and combined ratio. The net claims and claim expense ratio is calculated by dividing net claims and claim expenses incurred by net premiums
35
Table of Contents
earned. The underwriting expense ratio is calculated by dividing underwriting expenses (acquisition expenses and operational expenses) by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the net claims and claim expense ratio and the underwriting expense ratio. A combined ratio below 100% generally indicates profitable underwriting prior to the consideration of investment income. A combined ratio over 100% generally indicates unprofitable underwriting prior to the consideration of investment income. We also discuss our net claims and claim expense ratio on an accident year basis. This ratio is calculated by taking net claims and claim expenses, excluding development on net claims and claim expenses from events that took place in prior fiscal years, divided by net premiums earned.
We conduct our business through two reportable segments, Reinsurance and Individual Risk. Those segments are more fully described as follows:
Reinsurance
Our Reinsurance segment has three main units:
1) | Property catastrophe reinsurance, written for our own account and for DaVinci, is our traditional core business. We believe we are one of the worlds leading providers of this coverage, based on catastrophe gross premiums written. This coverage protects against large natural catastrophes, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis, as well as claims arising from other natural and man-made catastrophes such as winter storms, freezes, floods, fires, wind storms, tornadoes, explosions and acts of terrorism. We offer this coverage to insurance companies and other reinsurers primarily on an excess of loss basis. This means that we begin paying when our customers claims from a catastrophe exceed a certain retained amount. |
2) | Specialty reinsurance, written for our own account and for DaVinci, covering certain targeted classes of business where we believe we have a sound basis for underwriting and pricing the risk that we assume. Our portfolio includes various classes of business, such as catastrophe exposed workers compensation, surety, terrorism, medical malpractice, catastrophe-exposed personal lines property, casualty clash, certain other casualty lines and other specialty lines of reinsurance that we collectively refer to as specialty reinsurance. We believe that we are seen as a market leader in certain of these classes of business, such as casualty clash, surety, catastrophe-exposed workers compensation and terrorism. |
3) | Through our ventures unit, we pursue joint ventures and other strategic relationships. The principal business activities conducted by our ventures unit are: 1) property catastrophe joint ventures which we manage, such as Top Layer Re and DaVinci; 2) strategic investments in other market participants, such as our investments in Platinum and the Tower Hill Companies, where, rather than assuming exclusive management responsibilities ourselves, we partner with other market participants; 3) weather and energy risk operations through Renaissance Trading Ltd.; and 4) fee-based consulting services, research and development and loss mitigation activities. Only business activities that appear in our consolidated underwriting results, such as DaVinci, Tim Re II and certain reinsurance transactions, are included in our Reinsurance segment results; our share of the results of our investments in other ventures, accounted for under the equity method, and our weather-related activities are included in the Other category of our segment results. |
Individual Risk
We define our Individual Risk segment to include underwriting that involves understanding the characteristics of the original underlying insurance policy. In the second quarter of 2009, these operations commenced utilizing the RenRe Insurance brand. Our principal contracts include insurance contracts and quota share reinsurance with respect to risks including: 1) multi-peril crop, which includes multi-peril crop insurance, crop hail and other named peril agriculture risk management products; 2) commercial property, which principally includes catastrophe-exposed commercial property products; 3) commercial multi-line, which includes commercial property and liability coverage, such as general liability, automobile liability and physical damage, building and contents, professional liability and various specialty products; and 4) personal lines property, which principally includes homeowners personal lines property coverage and catastrophe exposed personal lines property coverage.
Our Individual Risk business is primarily produced through four distribution channels: 1) a wholly owned program manager where we write primary insurance through our own subsidiary; 2) third party program managers where we write primary insurance through third party program managers, who produce business pursuant to agreed-upon
36
Table of Contents
underwriting guidelines and provide related back-office functions; 3) quota share reinsurance where we write quota share reinsurance with primary insurers who, similar to our third party program managers, provide most of the back-office and support functions; and 4) brokers and agents where we write primary insurance produced through licensed intermediaries on a risk-by-risk basis.
Our Individual Risk business is written through the operating subsidiaries of RenRe Insurance Group, principally Glencoe and Lantana, which write on an excess and surplus lines basis, and through Stonington and Stonington Lloyds, which write on an admitted basis. Since the inception of our Individual Risk business, we have substantially relied on third parties for services including the generation of premium, the issuance of policies and the processing of claims, though as previously disclosed, we have internalized an increasing amount of these services over the past two years. We actively oversee our third party partners through an operations review team at RenRe North America Inc., which conducts initial due diligence as well as ongoing monitoring. We continue to invest in initiatives to strengthen our operating platform, enhance our internal capabilities, and expand the resources, including personnel, which we commit to our Individual Risk operations.
New Business
In addition to the potential growth of our existing reinsurance and insurance businesses, from time to time we consider diversification into new ventures, either through organic growth, the formation of new joint ventures, or the acquisition of or the investment in other companies or books of business of other companies. This potential diversification includes opportunities to write targeted, additional classes of risk-exposed business, both directly for our own account and through possible new joint venture opportunities. We also regularly evaluate opportunities to grow our business by utilizing our skills, capabilities, proprietary technology and relationships to expand into further risk-related coverages, services and products. Generally, we focus on underwriting or trading risks where reasonably sufficient data may be available, and where our analytical abilities may provide us a competitive advantage, in order for us to seek to model estimated probabilities of losses and returns in accordance with our approach in respect of our current portfolio of risks. We also regularly review potential new investments, in both operating entities and financial instruments. We believe the ongoing period of market dislocation may have increased the prospects that we can deploy capital in such initiatives at attractive expected rates of return.
In evaluating potential new ventures or investments, we generally seek an attractive estimated return on equity, the ability to develop or capitalize on a competitive advantage, and opportunities which we believe will not detract from our core Reinsurance and Individual Risk operations. Accordingly, we regularly review strategic opportunities and periodically engage in discussions regarding possible transactions, although there can be no assurance that we will complete any such transactions or that any such transaction would be successful or contribute materially to our results of operations or financial condition. We believe that our ability to potentially attract investment and operational opportunities is supported by our strong reputation and financial resources, and by the capabilities and track record of our ventures unit.
Risk Management
We seek to develop and effectively utilize sophisticated computer models and other analytical tools to assess and manage the risks that we underwrite and attempt to optimize our portfolio of reinsurance and insurance contracts and other financial risks. Our policies, procedures, tools and resources to monitor and assess our operational risks companywide, as well as our global enterprise-wide risk management practices, are overseen by our Chief Risk Officer, who reports directly to our Chief Financial Officer.
With respect to our Reinsurance operations, since 1993 we have developed and continuously seek to improve our proprietary, computer-based pricing and exposure management system, Renaissance Exposure Management System (REMS©). We believe that REMS©, as updated from time to time, is a more robust underwriting and risk management system than is currently commercially available elsewhere in the reinsurance industry and offers us a significant competitive advantage. REMS© was originally developed to analyze catastrophe risks, though we continuously seek ways to enhance the program in order to analyze other classes of risk.
In addition to using REMS©, within our Individual Risk operations we have developed a proprietary information management and analytical database, our Program Analysis Central Repository (PACeR), within which data related to substantially all our Individual Risk segment business is maintained. With the use and development of
37
Table of Contents
PACeR, we are seeking to develop statistical and analytical techniques to evaluate our program lines of business within our Individual Risk segment. We provide our third party program managers with access to PACeRs capabilities, which we believe helps support superior underwriting decisions, thus creating value for them and for us. Our objective is to have PACeR create an advantage for our Individual Risk operations by assisting us in building and maintaining a well-priced portfolio of specialty insurance risks.
SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Companys critical accounting estimates are discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008
Summary Overview
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts and ratios) | |||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 202,413 | $ | 239,806 | $ | (37,393 | ) | ||||||||
Net premiums written |
75,098 | 194,408 | (119,310 | ) | |||||||||||
Net premiums earned |
296,013 | 379,342 | (83,329 | ) | |||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
38,567 | 535,347 | (496,780 | ) | |||||||||||
Underwriting income (loss) |
167,745 | (240,532 | ) | 408,277 | |||||||||||
Net investment income |
106,815 | 15,767 | 91,048 | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
16,794 | 11,198 | 5,596 | ||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(346 | ) | (98,808 | ) | 98,462 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders |
258,628 | (230,974 | ) | 489,602 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per common share - diluted (1) |
$ | 4.12 | $ | (3.79 | ) | $ | 7.91 | ||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
36.8 | % | 150.6 | % | (113.8 | %) | |||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(23.8 | %) | (9.5 | %) | (14.3 | %) | |||||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
13.0 | % | 141.1 | % | (128.1 | %) | |||||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
30.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 8.0 | % | |||||||||
Combined ratio |
43.3 | % | 163.4 | % | (120.1 | %) | |||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2009 |
Change | % Change |
||||||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 49.21 | $ | 44.17 | $ | 5.04 | 11.4 | % | |||||||
Accumulated dividends per common share |
8.64 | 8.40 | 0.24 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||
Book value per common share plus accumulated dividends |
$ | 57.85 | $ | 52.57 | $ | 5.28 | |||||||||
(1) | Earnings per share calculations use average common shares outstanding basic, when in a net loss position, as required by FASB ASC Topic Earnings Per Share. |
Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders was $258.6 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to a net loss attributable to RenaissanceRe common shareholders of $231.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. Net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per fully diluted common share was $4.12 for the third quarter of 2009, compared to a net loss of $3.79 attributable to RenaissanceRe common shareholders per fully diluted common share in the third quarter of 2008. The $489.6 million increase in our net income available to RenaissanceRe common shareholders was primarily due to:
| a $408.3 million increase in underwriting income primarily due to a $496.8 million decrease in net claims and claim expenses, principally driven by a decrease in current accident year net claims and claim expenses due to a comparably low level of insured catastrophes occurring in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, specifically the comparative impact of events such as hurricanes Gustav and Ike, which occurred in the third quarter of 2008 and resulted in $419.6 million of underwriting losses in that quarter, as described in more detail below; |
38
Table of Contents
| significantly improved investment results including $91.0 million of additional net investment income and $5.6 million of additional net realized gains on investments and a $98.5 million decrease in net other-than-temporary impairments, during the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. The increase in net investment income was primarily due to higher total returns on certain non-investment grade allocations which are included in other investments. We also experienced higher returns on our hedge fund and private equity investments during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the third quarter of 2008. The reduction in net other-than-temporary impairments was due in part to our adoption in the second quarter of 2009 of new guidance on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, as described in more detail in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as improving market conditions for investments; and |
| partially offset by a $129.7 million increase in net income attributable to the redeemable noncontrolling interest DaVinciRe, due to increased profitability in DaVinciRe, driven by improved underwriting and investment results, and partially offset by our increased ownership in DaVinciRe. |
Book value per common share increased $5.04 to $49.21 at September 30, 2009, compared to $44.17 at June 30, 2009. Book value per common share plus accumulated dividends increased $5.28 to $57.85 at September 30, 2009, compared to $52.57 at June 30, 2009. The 11.4% growth in book value per common share was driven by comprehensive income attributable to RenaissanceRe of $335.5 million for the third quarter of 2009, and partially offset by $15.0 million of common dividends declared and paid during the third quarter of 2009. Common shares outstanding were 62.4 million and 62.3 million at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Underwriting Results
In the third quarter of 2009, we generated $167.7 million of underwriting income, compared to an underwriting loss of $240.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. The increase in underwriting income was driven primarily by a $496.8 million decrease in net claims and claim expenses, as a result of a comparably low level of insured catastrophes occurring in the third quarter of 2009, specifically the comparative impact of hurricanes Gustav and Ike which resulted in underwriting losses of $419.6 million in the third quarter of 2008, as discussed in more detail below. We generated a net claims and claim expense ratio of 13.0%, an underwriting expense ratio of 30.3% and a combined ratio of 43.3%, in the third quarter of 2009, compared to a net claims and claim expense ratio, an underwriting expense ratio and a combined ratio of 141.1%, 22.3% and 163.4%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008.
Gross premiums written decreased $37.4 million to $202.4 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $239.8 million in the third quarter of 2008. Gross premiums written for the third quarter of 2008 include $49.0 million of reinstatement premiums written as a result of the net claims and claim expense from hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Excluding reinstatement premiums written in the third quarter of 2008, gross premiums written would have been up $11.6 million. The Companys catastrophe premiums, excluding the impact of reinstatement premiums, increased $15.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, principally reflecting the continuation of attractive market conditions on a risk-adjusted basis in the Companys core markets, and the inception of a new program and other organic growth of the Companys portfolio. Our specialty reinsurance premiums decreased $3.0 million, to $25.2 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $28.2 million in the third quarter of 2008. As discussed in more detail below, this decrease is primarily due to the non-renewal and portfolio transfer out of a catastrophe exposed homeowners personal lines property quota share contract. Gross premiums written in our Individual Risk segment decreased $0.3 million to $83.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $83.7 million in the third quarter of 2008.
Net premiums written decreased $119.3 million in the third quarter of 2009 to $75.1 million from $194.4 million in the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the decrease in gross premiums written noted above and combined with an $81.9 million increase in ceded premiums written in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 as a result of the addition of several new reinsurance contracts purchased in our catastrophe unit as well as an increase in ceded premiums written within our Individual Risk segment related to our multi-peril crop insurance line of business. Net premiums earned decreased $83.3 million to $296.0 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared
39
Table of Contents
to $379.3 million, principally due to the $49.0 million of reinstatement premium that was written and earned in the third quarter of 2008 and did not recur in the third quarter of 2009, combined with the earned impact of the additional ceded premiums written noted above.
Net claims and claim expenses decreased by $496.8 million to $38.6 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $535.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to the comparably low level of insured catastrophes in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, specifically the comparative impact of events such as hurricanes Gustav and Ike, which occurred in the third quarter of 2008 and resulted in $458.8 million of net claims and claim expenses in our Reinsurance and Individual Risk segments in that quarter.
We recorded an overall net negative impact of $276.0 million from hurricanes Gustav and Ike in the third quarter of 2008. Net negative impact includes the sum of estimates of net claims and claim expenses incurred, earned reinstatement premiums assumed and ceded, lost profit commissions and minority interest. Our estimates of losses from hurricanes Gustav and Ike are based on factors including currently available information derived from the Companys preliminary claims information from certain clients and brokers, industry assessments of losses from the events, proprietary models, and the terms and conditions of our contracts. Given the magnitude and relatively recent occurrence of these events, meaningful uncertainty remains regarding total covered losses for the insurance industry and, accordingly, several of the key assumptions underlying our loss estimates. In addition, actual losses from these events may increase if our reinsurers or other obligors fail to meet their obligations. Our actual losses from these events will likely vary, perhaps materially, from these current estimates due to the inherent uncertainties in reserving for such losses, including the preliminary nature of the available information, the potential inaccuracies and inadequacies in the data provided by clients and brokers, the inherent uncertainty of modeling techniques and the application of such techniques, the effects of any demand surge on claims activity and complex coverage and other legal issues.
Following is supplemental financial data regarding the net financial statement impact on our results for the third quarter of 2008 due to hurricanes Gustav and Ike:
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
Gustav | Ike | Total | |||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
$ | (80.3 | ) | $ | (378.5 | ) | $ | (458.8 | ) | |||
Net reinstatement premiums earned |
12.3 | 31.6 | 43.9 | |||||||||
Lost profit commissions |
(1.9 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||
Net impact on underwriting result |
(69.9 | ) | (349.7 | ) | (419.6 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest - DaVinciRe |
25.3 | 118.3 | 143.6 | |||||||||
Net negative impact |
$ | (44.6 | ) | $ | (231.4 | ) | $ | (276.0 | ) | |||
Percentage point impact on combined ratio |
16.9 | 94.8 | 116.8 |
We experienced $70.4 million of favorable development on prior year reserves in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $36.0 million of favorable development in the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to decreased net claims and claim expenses in our Reinsurance segment as a result of reductions in estimated ultimate losses on certain specific events within the catastrophe unit, and within the specialty unit, lower than expected claims emergence.
The 8.0 percentage point increase in our underwriting expense ratio to 30.3% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to 22.3% in the third quarter of 2008, was principally driven by an increase in operational expenses of $15.2 million. The increase in operational expenses was primarily as a result of an increase in our employee base which has increased compensation and related operating expenses, and partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in acquisition expenses, primarily as a result of higher profit commissions on ceded premiums earned, on lower net premiums earned which have decreased $83.3 million to $296.0 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $379.3 million in the third quarter of 2008.
40
Table of Contents
Underwriting Results by Segment
Reinsurance Segment
Below is a summary of the underwriting results and ratios for our Reinsurance segment followed by an analysis of our catastrophe unit and specialty unit underwriting results and ratios for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Reinsurance segment overview
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||
Gross premiums written (1) |
$ | 132,487 | $ | 169,463 | $ | (36,976 | ) | |||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 43,202 | $ | 129,229 | $ | (86,027 | ) | |||||
Net premiums earned |
202,260 | 251,058 | (48,798 | ) | ||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
(15,914 | ) | 423,568 | (439,482 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition expenses |
17,164 | 34,469 | (17,305 | ) | ||||||||
Operational expenses |
33,961 | 20,602 | 13,359 | |||||||||
Underwriting income (loss) |
$ | 167,049 | $ | (227,581 | ) | $ | 394,630 | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 46,755 | $ | 454,187 | $ | (407,432 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(62,669 | ) | (30,619 | ) | (32,050 | ) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | (15,914 | ) | $ | 423,568 | $ | (439,482 | ) | ||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
23.1 | % | 180.9 | % | (157.8 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(31.0 | %) | (12.2 | %) | (18.8 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
(7.9 | %) | 168.7 | % | (176.6 | %) | ||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
25.3 | % | 21.9 | % | 3.4 | % | ||||||
Combined ratio |
17.4 | % | 190.6 | % | (173.2 | %) | ||||||
(1) | Reinsurance gross premiums written includes $13.4 million and $13.3 million of premiums assumed from the Individual Risk segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Reinsurance Segment Gross Premiums Written Gross premiums written in our Reinsurance segment decreased by $37.0 million, or 21.8%, to $132.5 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $169.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. Gross premiums written in our Reinsurance segment in the third quarter of 2008 include $49.0 million of reinstatement premiums written on behalf of our catastrophe unit as a result of hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Excluding these reinstatement premiums, gross premiums written in our Reinsurance segment increased $12.0 million due to our catastrophe unit which benefited from our ability and determination to increase the capacity provided to our clients in light of, among other things, continuing attractive market conditions, partially offset by a decline in our specialty reinsurance premiums. Our Reinsurance segment results have been increasingly impacted in recent periods by a relatively small number of comparably large transactions with significant clients.
41
Table of Contents
Reinsurance Segment Underwriting Results Our Reinsurance segment generated $167.0 million of underwriting income in the third quarter of 2009, compared to an underwriting loss of $227.6 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $394.6 million. The increase in underwriting income was primarily due to a decrease in net claims and claim expenses of $439.5 million due to the comparably low level of insured catastrophes in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, specifically the comparative impact of events such as hurricanes Gustav and Ike. We incurred $424.2 million of net claims and claim expenses during the third quarter of 2008 related to hurricanes Gustav and Ike, adding 166.0 percentage points to the Reinsurance segments combined ratio. In the third quarter of 2009, our Reinsurance segment generated a net claims and claim expense ratio of negative 7.9%, an underwriting expense ratio of 25.3% and a combined ratio of 17.4%, compared to 168.7%, 21.9% and 190.6%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008. Current accident year losses of $46.8 million decreased $407.4 million from $454.2 million in the third quarter of 2008, due to the comparably low level of catastrophes occurring during the third quarter of 2009, specifically the comparative impact of events such as hurricanes Gustav and Ike which occurred in the third quarter of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, we experienced favorable development on prior years reserves of $62.7 million, compared to $30.6 million of favorable development in the third quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of reductions in estimated ultimate losses on certain specific events within the catastrophe unit, and lower than expected claims emergence within the specialty unit. The increase in our underwriting expense ratio to 25.3% in the third quarter of 2009 from 21.9% in the third quarter of 2008 was principally driven by a $48.8 million decrease in net premiums earned, principally due to the lack of reinstatement premiums written and earned in the third quarter of 2008, as total underwriting expenses remained relatively stable at $51.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $55.1 million in the third quarter of 2008.
Following is supplemental financial data regarding the net impact on our Reinsurance segments underwriting results for the third quarter of 2008 due to hurricanes Gustav and Ike:
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | Reinsurance | |||||||||||
Gustav | Ike | Total | ||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
$ | (70.3 | ) | $ | (353.9 | ) | $ | (424.2 | ) | |||
Net reinstatement premiums earned |
12.3 | 36.7 | 49.0 | |||||||||
Lost profit commissions |
(1.9 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||
Net impact on underwriting result |
$ | (59.9 | ) | $ | (320.0 | ) | $ | (379.9 | ) | |||
Percentage point impact on combined ratio |
20.4 | 133.8 | 166.0 |
We have entered into joint ventures and specialized quota share cessions of our book of business. In accordance with the joint venture and quota share agreements, we are entitled to certain profit commissions and fee income, subject to the terms of these agreements. We record these profit commissions and fees as a reduction in acquisition and operating expenses and, accordingly, these fees have generally reduced our underwriting expense ratios. These fees totaled $16.5 million and $1.1 million for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and resulted in a corresponding decrease to the Reinsurance segment underwriting expense ratio of 8.1% and 0.5% for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, our agreements with DaVinci provide for certain fee income and profit commissions. Because the results of DaVinci, and its parent DaVinciRe, are consolidated in our results of operations, these fees and profit commissions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are principally reflected in redeemable noncontrolling interest. The net impact of all fees and profit commissions related to these joint ventures and specialized quota share cessions within our Reinsurance segment was $31.0 million and $1.8 million for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
42
Table of Contents
Catastrophe
Below is a summary of the underwriting results and ratios for our catastrophe unit for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Catastrophe overview
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||
Property catastrophe gross premiums written |
||||||||||||
Renaissance |
$ | 78,232 | $ | 97,839 | $ | (19,607 | ) | |||||
DaVinci |
29,076 | 43,413 | (14,337 | ) | ||||||||
Total property catastrophe gross premiums written (1) |
$ | 107,308 | $ | 141,252 | $ | (33,944 | ) | |||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 19,656 | $ | 101,018 | $ | (81,362 | ) | |||||
Net premiums earned |
176,519 | 217,626 | (41,107 | ) | ||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
(3,068 | ) | 410,683 | (413,751 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition expenses |
14,365 | 27,838 | (13,473 | ) | ||||||||
Operational expenses |
25,303 | 16,037 | 9,266 | |||||||||
Underwriting income (loss) |
$ | 139,919 | $ | (236,932 | ) | $ | 376,851 | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 35,030 | $ | 440,740 | $ | (405,710 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(38,098 | ) | (30,057 | ) | (8,041 | ) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | (3,068 | ) | $ | 410,683 | $ | (413,751 | ) | ||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
19.8 | % | 202.5 | % | (182.7 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(21.5 | %) | (13.8 | %) | (7.7 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
(1.7 | %) | 188.7 | % | (190.4 | %) | ||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
22.4 | % | 20.2 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||||
Combined ratio |
20.7 | % | 208.9 | % | (188.2 | %) | ||||||
(1) | Includes gross premiums written ceded from the Individual Risk segment to the catastrophe unit of $13.4 million and $13.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Catastrophe Reinsurance Gross Premiums Written In the third quarter of 2009, our catastrophe reinsurance gross premiums written decreased by $33.9 million, or 24.0%, to $107.3 million, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Gross premiums written in our catastrophe unit in the third quarter of 2008 included $49.0 million of reinstatement premiums written as a result of hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Excluding these reinstatement premiums, gross premiums written in our catastrophe unit increased $15.1 million due to the continuation of attractive market conditions on a risk-adjusted basis in our core markets and the inception of a new program and other organic growth of our portfolio. Our catastrophe reinsurance results can be substantially impacted, and have been in recent periods, by a relatively small number of comparably large transactions with significant clients.
Catastrophe Reinsurance Underwriting Results Our catastrophe unit generated $139.9 million of underwriting income in the third quarter of 2009, compared to an underwriting loss of $236.9 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $376.9 million. The increase in underwriting income was due primarily to a $413.8 million decrease in net claims and claim expenses as a result of current accident year net claims and claim expenses decreasing $405.7 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, as discussed below. In the third quarter of 2009, our catastrophe unit generated a net claims and claim expense ratio of negative 1.7%, an underwriting expense ratio of 22.4% and a combined ratio of 20.7%, compared to 188.7%, 20.2% and 208.9%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008. Current accident year net claims and claim expenses in the third quarter of 2008 were impacted by hurricanes Gustav and Ike, which resulted in $424.2 million of net claims and claims incurred and added 193.7 percentage points to the catastrophe units combined ratio.
43
Table of Contents
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Catastrophe | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | Gustav | Ike | Total | |||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
$ | (70.3 | ) | $ | (353.9 | ) | $ | (424.2 | ) | |||
Net reinstatement premiums earned |
12.3 | 36.7 | 49.0 | |||||||||
Lost profit commissions |
(1.9 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||
Net impact on underwriting result |
$ | (59.9 | ) | $ | (320.0 | ) | $ | (379.9 | ) | |||
Percentage point impact on combined ratio |
22.7 | 154.8 | 193.7 |
During the third quarter of 2009, we experienced $38.1 million of favorable development on prior year reserves, compared to $30.1 million of favorable development on prior years reserves in the third quarter of 2008. The favorable development in the third quarter of 2009 was the result of reductions in ultimate loss estimates on specific events, including European windstorm Kyrill (2007), a California wildfire (2007), hurricane Dean (2007) and hurricane Emily (2005). The favorable development in the third quarter of 2008 was primarily related to lower than expected claims emergence on the United Kingdom (U.K.) flooding (2007), hurricane Dean (2007), an industrial catastrophe loss (2005) and a number of small catastrophe events from the 2007 and 2006 accident years. The increase in our operating expense ratio to 14.3% in the third quarter of 2009 from 7.4% in the third quarter of 2008 was principally driven by a $9.3 million increase in operational expenses, primarily as a result of an increase in our employee base which has increased compensation and related operating expenses, combined with a $41.1 million decrease in net premiums earned. The decrease in net premiums earned is due to the decrease in gross premiums written, noted above, combined with the $47.4 million increase in ceded premiums written as a result of the addition of several new reinsurance purchases during the third quarter of 2009.
44
Table of Contents
Specialty
Below is a summary of the underwriting results and ratios for our specialty reinsurance unit for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Specialty overview
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||
Specialty gross premiums written |
||||||||||||
Renaissance |
$ | 25,249 | $ | 28,408 | $ | (3,159 | ) | |||||
DaVinci |
(70 | ) | (197 | ) | 127 | |||||||
Total specialty gross premiums written |
$ | 25,179 | $ | 28,211 | $ | (3,032 | ) | |||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 23,546 | $ | 28,211 | $ | (4,665 | ) | |||||
Net premiums earned |
25,741 | 33,432 | (7,691 | ) | ||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
(12,846 | ) | 12,885 | (25,731 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition expenses |
2,799 | 6,631 | (3,832 | ) | ||||||||
Operational expenses |
8,658 | 4,565 | 4,093 | |||||||||
Underwriting income |
$ | 27,130 | $ | 9,351 | $ | 17,779 | ||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 11,725 | $ | 13,447 | $ | (1,722 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior accident years |
(24,571 | ) | (562 | ) | (24,009 | ) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | (12,846 | ) | $ | 12,885 | $ | (25,731 | ) | ||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
45.5 | % | 40.2 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(95.4 | %) | (1.7 | %) | (93.7 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
(49.9 | %) | 38.5 | % | (88.4 | %) | ||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
44.5 | % | 33.5 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||
Combined ratio |
(5.4 | %) | 72.0 | % | (77.4 | %) | ||||||
Specialty Reinsurance Gross Premiums Written In the third quarter of 2009, our specialty reinsurance gross premiums written decreased by $3.0 million, or 10.7%, to $25.2 million, compared to $28.2 million in the third quarter of 2008, due principally to the non-renewal and portfolio transfer out of a catastrophe exposed homeowners personal lines property quota share contract and partially offset by new business. Our specialty reinsurance premiums are prone to significant volatility as this business is characterized by a relatively small number of comparably large transactions.
Specialty Reinsurance Underwriting Results Our specialty unit generated $27.1 million of underwriting income in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $9.4 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $17.8 million, principally due to a $24.0 million increase in favorable development on prior accident year net claims and claim expenses, discussed in more detail below, and partially offset by a decrease in net premiums earned as a result of a decrease in our gross premiums written over the last year which has resulted in lower net premiums earned. The favorable development on prior year reserves of $24.6 million and $0.6 million during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, was primarily driven by lower than expected reported claims on prior year reserves. In the third quarter of 2009, our specialty unit generated a net claims and claim expense ratio of negative 49.9%, an underwriting expense ratio of 44.5% and a combined ratio of negative 5.4%, compared to 38.5%, 33.5% and 72.0%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008. The 11.0 percentage point increase in our underwriting expense ratio was principally driven by lower net premiums earned as the $4.1 million increase in operational expenses was principally offset by a $3.8 million decrease in acquisition expenses. The increase in operational expenses is primarily as a
45
Table of Contents
result of an increase in our employee base which has increased compensation and related operating expenses. Acquisition expenses decreased as a result of the non-renewal and portfolio transfer out of a catastrophe exposed homeowners personal lines property quota share contract which had a higher acquisition expense ratio relative to other programs in the specialty unit.
Individual Risk Segment
Below is a summary of the underwriting results and ratios for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for our Individual Risk segment:
Individual Risk segment overview
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ratios) | ||||||||||||
Commercial multi-line |
$ | 31,066 | $ | 29,773 | $ | 1,293 | ||||||
Multi-peril crop |
21,296 | 11,881 | 9,415 | |||||||||
Commercial property |
15,514 | 24,863 | (9,349 | ) | ||||||||
Personal lines property |
15,473 | 17,168 | (1,695 | ) | ||||||||
Gross premiums written |
$ | 83,349 | $ | 83,685 | $ | (336 | ) | |||||
Net premiums written |
$ | 31,896 | $ | 65,179 | $ | (33,283 | ) | |||||
Net premiums earned |
$ | 93,753 | $ | 128,284 | $ | (34,531 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
54,481 | 111,779 | (57,298 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
27,039 | 19,762 | 7,277 | |||||||||
Operational expenses |
11,537 | 9,694 | 1,843 | |||||||||
Underwriting income (loss) |
$ | 696 | $ | (12,951 | ) | $ | 13,647 | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - current accident year |
$ | 62,256 | $ | 117,157 | $ | (54,901 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - prior years |
(7,775 | ) | (5,378 | ) | (2,397 | ) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred - total |
$ | 54,481 | $ | 111,779 | $ | (57,298 | ) | |||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - current accident year |
66.4 | % | 91.3 | % | (24.9 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - prior accident years |
(8.3 | %) | (4.2 | %) | (4.1 | %) | ||||||
Net claims and claim expense ratio - calendar year |
58.1 | % | 87.1 | % | (29.0 | %) | ||||||
Underwriting expense ratio |
41.2 | % | 23.0 | % | 18.2 | % | ||||||
Combined ratio |
99.3 | % | 110.1 | % | (10.8 | %) | ||||||
Individual Risk Segment Gross Premiums Written Gross premiums written by our Individual Risk segment were relatively flat at $83.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $83.7 million in the third quarter of 2008. Multi-peril crop insurance gross premiums written during the third quarter of 2009 increased $9.4 million, to $21.3 million, from $11.9 million in the third quarter of 2008, primarily driven by an increase in policy count and insured acres which more than offset a decline in commodity prices used in determining the policy premium. Offsetting the increase in multi-peril crop insurance gross premiums written during the third quarter of 2009, was our commercial property gross premiums written which decreased $9.3 million, to $15.5 million from $24.9 million in the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to our decision in late 2008 to terminate a commercial property quota share reinsurance contract.
Our Individual Risk segment premiums can fluctuate significantly between quarters and between years based on several factors, including, without limitation, the timing of the inception or cessation of new program managers and quota share reinsurance contracts, including whether or not we have portfolio transfers in, or portfolio transfers out, of quota share reinsurance contracts of in-force books of business. In addition, our gross premiums written in respect of our multi-peril crop insurance line of business are subject to fluctuations from a number of factors including the impact of relevant commodity prices.
46
Table of Contents
Individual Risk Segment Underwriting Results Our Individual Risk segment generated underwriting income of $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to an underwriting loss of $13.0 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $13.6 million. In the third quarter of 2009, our Individual Risk segment generated a net claims and claim expense ratio of 58.1%, an underwriting expense ratio of 41.2% and a combined ratio of 99.3%, compared to 87.1%, 23.0% and 110.1%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008. The increase in underwriting income and decrease in our combined ratio was principally driven by the absence of catastrophe events such as hurricanes Gustav and Ike which occurred in the third quarter of 2008. Hurricanes Gustav and Ike resulted in $39.7 million in underwriting losses and added 30.2 percentage points to the Individual Risk segments combined ratio in the third quarter of 2008, as detailed in the table below. Partially offsetting the lack of hurricane-related losses in the third quarter of 2009 was the impact of significantly higher crop hail losses within the Individual Risk segments multi-peril crop insurance line of business in the third quarter of 2009. Multiple hail storms in highly insured areas during the third quarter of 2009 resulted in $16.6 million of underwriting losses in crop hail, a specific product line within the overall multi-peril crop insurance line of business, compared to $3.0 million of underwriting profits for this product line in the third quarter of 2008.
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | Three months ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||
Individual Risk | ||||||||||||
Gustav | Ike | Total | ||||||||||
Net claims and claim expenses incurred |
$ | (10.0 | ) | $ | (24.6 | ) | $ | (34.6 | ) | |||
Net reinstatement premiums earned |
| (5.1 | ) | (5.1 | ) | |||||||
Lost profit commissions |
| | | |||||||||
Net impact on underwriting result |
$ | (10.0 | ) | $ | (29.7 | ) | $ | (39.7 | ) | |||
Percentage point impact on combined ratio |
7.8 | 22.7 | 30.2 |
The Companys Individual Risk segment prior year reserves experienced $7.8 million of favorable development in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $5.4 million of favorable development in the third quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of lower than expected reported claims on prior year reserves.
Underwriting expenses in the third quarter of 2009 were $38.6 million and the underwriting expense ratio was 41.2%, compared to $29.5 million and 23.0%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2008. The 18.2 percentage point increase in our underwriting expense ratio was driven by increased acquisition expenses, primarily due to profit sharing commissions, increased operating expenses, as discussed below, and decreased net premiums earned, primarily due to the portion of the estimated underwriting income in association with the multi-peril crop insurance business that is remitted to the U.S. government in the form of ceded premiums earned. Operational expenses increased $1.8 million, adding 2.0 percentage points to the underwriting expense ratio, principally as a result of our investment in personnel and related infrastructure in association with our ongoing business development initiatives.
As discussed below under Reserves for Claims and Claim Expenses, the most significant accounting judgment made by management is our estimate of claims and claim expense reserves. In our multi-peril crop insurance line of business, insureds are required under policy terms to report all potential claims whether or not the insured believes that the crops can be re-planted and harvested; therefore, managements estimates are subject to significant variability based on factors such as the timing of an event that may have given rise to a loss in light of the overall potential planting season; whether an insured is able to re-plant and ultimately harvest all or a portion of the crop, which will not generally be known until the end of the crop season, or in some cases, well into the following year; as well as what commodity prices are at the end of the policy period. In addition, management has to estimate which losses will be ceded to the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. Our estimate of net claims and claim expenses incurred for the multi-peril crop insurance business reflects these judgments and actual results will vary, perhaps materially so, and be adjusted as new information is known and becomes available.
47
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Fixed maturity investments available for sale |
$ | 44,127 | $ | 52,087 | $ | (7,960 | ) | |||||
Short term investments |
2,285 | 9,990 | (7,705 | ) | ||||||||
Other investments |
||||||||||||
Hedge funds and private equity investments |
15,510 | (15,080 | ) | 30,590 | ||||||||
Other |
47,748 | (30,306 | ) | 78,054 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
102 | 1,956 | (1,854 | ) | ||||||||
109,772 | 18,647 | 91,125 | ||||||||||
Investment expenses |
(2,957 | ) | (2,880 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 106,815 | $ | 15,767 | $ | 91,048 | ||||||
Net investment income was $106.8 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to net investment income of $15.8 million in the third quarter of 2008. The $91.0 million increase in net investment income was principally driven by a $30.6 million increase from our hedge funds and private equity investments and a $78.1 million increase in net investment income from our other investments, principally senior secured bank loan funds and non-U.S. fixed income funds, and partially offset by an $8.0 million and a $7.7 million decrease in net investment income from our fixed maturity investments available for sale and short term investments, respectively. The hedge fund, private equity and other investment portfolios are accounted for at fair value with the change in fair value recorded in net investment income which included net unrealized gains of $19.2 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $54.3 million of net unrealized losses in the third quarter of 2008. Our net investment income for the third quarter of 2009 benefited from the significant tightening of credit spreads and improvement in the equity markets during the quarter, which resulted in increases in the fair value of many of our investments. We do not anticipate a repeat of this quarters investment performance in future periods.
The reductions in the Federal Funds rate by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board and corresponding decline in interest rates has lowered the interest rate at which we invest our assets. We expect these developments, combined with the current composition of our investment portfolio and other factors, to put downward pressure on our net investment income for the foreseeable future. Among other factors, our current asset allocations reflect a relative reduction from earlier periods of the number of classes of securities characterized by higher estimated yields and expected risk, which has reduced the yield to maturity for our investment portfolio and which we expect will also impact future net investment income.
Net Realized Gains on Investments and Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Gross realized gains |
$ | 26,734 | $ | 20,007 | $ | 6,727 | ||||||
Gross realized losses |
(9,940 | ) | (8,809 | ) | (1,131 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
$ | 16,794 | $ | 11,198 | $ | 5,596 | ||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairments |
(1,408 | ) | (98,808 | ) | 97,400 | |||||||
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income, before taxes |
1,062 | | 1,062 | |||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
$ | (346 | ) | $ | (98,808 | ) | $ | 98,462 | ||||
Net realized gains on investments were $16.8 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $11.2 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $5.6 million, principally driven by a $6.7 million increase in realized gains. Net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings were $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $98.8 million for the third quarter of 2008. Net other-than-temporary impairments relate to our fixed maturity investments available for sale. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 we recognized other-than-temporary
48
Table of Contents
impairments if we could not assert that we had the ability and intent to hold our securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value in accordance with authoritative literature. If the impairment was determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss was recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized other-than-temporary impairments under updated GAAP guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments which was adopted in the second quarter of 2009. Of the total other-than-temporary impairment charges in the third quarter of 2009, $0.3 million was recognized in earnings and includes $0.3 million for credit losses and $nil for investments we intend to sell, with the remaining $1.1 million related to other factors recorded as an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income. Under the guidance adopted in the second quarter of 2009, we recognize other-than-temporary impairments in earnings for impaired fixed maturity investments available for sale (i) for which we have the intent to sell the security or (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery and (iii) for those securities which have a credit loss.
Equity in Earnings of Other Ventures
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Top Layer Re |
$ | 3,385 | $ | 2,431 | $ | 954 | ||||||
Tower Hill and the Tower Hill Companies |
1,098 | (832 | ) | 1,930 | ||||||||
Starbound II |
| 777 | (777 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(152 | ) | (43 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||||
Total equity in earnings of other ventures |
$ | 4,331 | $ | 2,333 | $ | 1,998 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of other ventures in the third quarter of 2009 primarily represents our pro-rata share of the net income from our investments in Top Layer Re, Tower Hill and the Tower Hill Companies, and in the third quarter of 2008, Starbound Reinsurance II Ltd. (Starbound II). Equity in earnings of other ventures generated $4.3 million of income in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2008. The $2.0 million increase in equity in earnings of other ventures in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 is due to increased earnings from Top Layer Re and Tower Hill and the Tower Hill Companies as a result of strong underwriting and investment results for Top Layer Re and partially offset by Starbound II becoming a consolidated entity effective August 1, 2008, and therefore excluded from equity in earnings of other ventures from that date forward.
The equity pick-up for our earnings in Tower Hill and the Tower Hill Companies is recorded one quarter in arrears.
49
Table of Contents
Other Income
Three months ended September 30, |
2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||
Weather and energy risk operations |
$ | 13,674 | $ | (589 | ) | $ | 14,263 | |||||
Mark-to-market on Platinum warrant |
12,839 | 5,538 | 7,301 | |||||||||
Weather-related and loss mitigation |
(2,110 | ) | (3,070 | ) | 960 | |||||||
Assumed and ceded reinsurance contracts accounted for at fair value or as deposits |
(13,147 | ) | (1,847 | ) | (11,300 | ) | ||||||
Other items |
2,168 |